Showing posts with label #NBA MVP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #NBA MVP. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Golden State Leaving It's Mark.... And It's Green

When it comes to this Golden State Warriors all time regular season win streak, I'm really concerned that folks just don't get it. Winning the most regular season games has a value only useful for barber shop crap talk.

No really.  These guys are pushing for a record that will only matter if they win it all, and even then only for the sake of looking like a peacock while sitting in that hair chair getting yo' doo did.

Now, I am perfectly black enough to get why barbershop crap is actually kinda important, but I'm also old enough to recognize risk over reward.  Also, I am cheap enough and bald enough to not have used a barber in years, so the barbershop dozens are no longer a part of my world.  If I had an NBA title to defend, and a full head of hair that demanded trained barber love and not just that trim the fuzz cut I do at home in my bathroom, I would try to do something that no team has ever done before too, and simply winning back to back is passe. Lots of teams have accomplished that.

I've followed the Warriors just like the rest of the universe, and I've written in the past that the season opening streak was an out of control monster. The health issues of Warriors head coach Steve Kerr left a spineless figurehead in interim coach Luke Walton to pull the strings of the kite and keep the wind from snatching it from his grip, sending it off towards a journey that usually ends horribly.

This run away kite turned a few loopty loops, launched a couple of half court 3 pointers and soared far from the grips of the interim coach's hand, and also out of the functional grip of the real coach who soon would return to the bench.  The out of control start to the season forced Golden State's true leader to keep the ship intact whilst it meandered on a journey few teams have ever ventured to take.

The evidence is clear as it spews freely from the mouth of this team's unquestioned leader,
Draymond Green

It was Green who admitted that the streak might have gotten to be too much before declaring that the regular season win total still stood within reach. It was Green who doubted that it could be done...until around game 50 when it was clear they were still on track to do it- which signifies the moment he decided, why not?.  If you listen to their leader now, Green says that his own coach can't really stop them from trying for the record.  Short staffed or full staff, Green has the influence to dictate the intensity of team play, whether on the court or glaring like a bully from the bench.  Green is both the engine and the brains of the Warriors operation, and Kerr himself would be replaced if he alienated and risked his team the long term services of Draymond Green. For Green, unlike the coach, is the only person that can not be replaced.

His defensive back line support against LeBron is the reason Golden State won one title, and he and said defensive support are still their best hope for getting two. Green is the only reason we even use the term "small ball" because his ability to play five spots on the floor make the Warriors small ball the blueprint- everybody else a copy.  Steph has the highlights and Russell Westbrook does the triple double thing, but even Paul George or LeBron himself DON'T have the plus/minus numbers that Green put up this year.

In fact, NO ONE has ever achieved the plus/minus production that Green has done during this season (although the metric is something the NBA has only tracked in the modern era of basketball). We might actually be witnessing a best player bait and switch move.  As we wait anxiously to anoint a stupendous scorer with average defense as the best player in the entire league, Green keeps proving himself to be "that" player of the so called best team in the league. Even this year's 3 point contest winner, Klay Thompson, could tally similar points to Steph with the same amount of offensive attempts, while his defense is among the best we've ever seen in this league.

With similar shot attempts, would Klay Thompson
score just as efficiently (or better) than Curry? 
How exactly is Curry the best player in the league but close to second or third on his own team? Thompson and Green do way more heavy lifting than does Curry, and are often saving the day on defense or the boards. In reality, the Warriors are much too balanced to really have or need an MVP.  Nonetheless, they will have two.  One that wins the award and one that earned it for him by gobbling up his misses for that second chance kickout, the true key to winning basketball in the first place since statistically, players (including Steph) mostly miss that first shot attempt.

I don't often respect the selection for MVP because it is notoriously given one or two years after it was most deserved, almost as a form of lifetime achievement award, much like all-star game selections. Is LeBron still the true MVP?  Overall, he is still the most impactful, but Green is so close on his heels that he might surpass LeBron before you finish this read.

Curry will continue to dazzle, but will never have the complete ability to impact all aspects of the game.  Green can and does, on and off the court.

On the court, Green is the best player not named LeBron. Off it, he declares that Kerr can't stop the pursuit of 73 wins even while Kerr admits that the record is meaningless to him- then smiles a sly grin realizing that he can't stop Green.

This pursuit is about history, and history has to be made by teams and players that can make it. Is Golden State that kind of team?

Yes they are, but chasing history comes at a price.  To start the season with an undefeated streak forces you to achieve some kind of mark worthy of the all that energy you expended in the first place. 73 wins is that mark, but to set that mark and not win the title would be a waste of all the energy it took to set the regular season mark, which is why coach Kerr could care less about this record.


If the coach doesn't care for the pursuit, why does Green think that it shouldn't and won't be stopped?

Green already has gold, so why not?  

Given the determination of San Antonio, Cleveland, or the Clippers to unseat the Warriors and win their own gold, I don't think Green is really doing the right thing. Unless of course he is moving to make his mark as the best player in the NBA and among the best of all time. In that case, Green is looking to do the only thing all time greats think of.

Make history.


Thursday, May 21, 2015

What The Flop Is The NBA Doing Fining Steph?

What the flop is the NBA thinking fining Steph Curry for flopping?



First of all, the rule that instituted fining people who choose to flop was a stupid rule to begin with.  Not that I didn't appreciate the league's attempt to keep Manu Ginobli from making me turn the channel until the part of the game when flops get ignored so that ref's don't dictate outcomes. The idea was beyond admirable, and my initial response came with an equal level of appreciation and trepidation when the rule came to be.  The trepidation, however, comes from the difficulty with determining a flop in the first place.


Some Dude's (Me) Hack Too Much

I've personally stopped playing a lot of organized basketball simply because of the referee problem that makes it difficult for guys like me.  While I admit to being one of the most skilled fouler's in the history of fouling, I also have never intentionally flopped.  I have come to accept that shooting and flopping are not easy to do at the same time if you have any hope of making the shot. Despite the high double digit fouling that I intentionally get away with every single game that I play, I rarely foul out of games.  On the other hand, since I don't understand the flop technique and usually absorb contact without major shot disruption, I often get fouled without getting the calls I deserve.  In the grand scheme of things, it all probably balances out in the end.

You see, the problem with this whole flopping debate is that most really good referee's do not lean towards the heavy whistle side of basketball, especially in the NBA playoffs or old men basketball leagues when physicality amps up a bit.  If basketball game officials chose to keep the whistle blowing in concert with the increased level of fouls in the playoffs, then the game would hardly be watchable.

In last nights Cavs .vs. Hawks game, I watched LeBron James drive to the whole with 3 dudes draped all over him on multiple occasions. No foul called.  In fact, the only real hope that even LeBron, the best player in the world, has of getting a foul called during late game action is to flop a bit.  Taking the foul strongly and focusing on finishing is a formula for getting the field goal, but not the "and one" or the two shot foul you probably deserve,

To Steph Curry's credit, he is paying $5,000 for a flop that really did happen, but not for the reason's that some guy's do it.  Steph is a reactionary flopper in that he focuses on the shot, and falls away from the contact because small guys better fall away just to minimize the bangs and bruises that come with being great.  If I were playing against Curry, I would have to assume he's shooting jump shots, and be near to poke, prod and manipulate his pre and post shot, until he becomes uncomfortable.

In other words, I would foul his arse as much as I could get away with.  Such an approach is not novel.  It is the only hope you have against these type of players.  Conversely, flopping or accentuating the contact is the only hope that such players have to shine a light on the extra that goes on when stars shoot the ball.  If you watch the play, Steph pushes off on Corey Brewer in order to gain the free look, and then gets brushed against the arm from a player trailing the action.  With this player coming from the trail side, his near block of Curry forced the contact that lead to Curry's $5,000 flop.

To the NBA's credit, they've warned players of these potential fines over a year ago, so anyone who pays has very little room to point fingers.  Actually, they could point fingers at the hundreds of players who continue to flop without penalty and ask the question of, why me? Why so sporadic in the enforcement of the rules and why would you decide to open blind eyes on this season's MVP, especially on a less than obvious flop?

There is a statement in this particular fine, but its neither clear or for Curry alone.




Friday, March 27, 2015

Why Don't Modern Basketball Fans Understand Triple Doubles?


I probably would not have cared to write this one if it weren't for all of those people who don't understand what the words "Triple Double" actually mean (see; Amin Elhassan of ESPN)

Certain sports fans, mostly of a younger generation, have never really seen the triple double player in action.  Michael Jordan was an incredible player who flooded the stat sheet every night- but not often with triple doubles.  Jordan started playing when the triple double era was ending.  In many ways, Jordan didn't win a thing until the triple double legends moved aside to let him have his time under the sun.

Jordan's heir apparent, King LeBron James, is equally capable of completing double digit production in any one of the categories that make up a potential triple double- but even he doesn't get triple doubles very often. At his current pace, he won't finish his career with more of them than legendary big man Wilt Chamberlain who defines the post passer.

Since the era of the triple double ended, the players that have gotten them with some level of noteworthiness have been slim and few.  David Robinson would grab one here and there because of his ability to block so many shots.  Allen Iverson might have snatched a couple of them when his gambling defense paid off and he actually stole 10 balls to add to the 10 buckets he always gave while trying for steals.  Steals and blocks are  really tough to come by, so they are the least common stats to round out  a triple double.  Double doubles are extremely common because many players can both score and rebound in double digits on any given night. But triple doubles?  They remain extra special because they are usually done by a certain kind of player.


PASS THE BALL

Triple doubles are something that died with the era of the double digit assist makers. Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, even local favorite Lafayette "Fat" Lever used to post a bunch. Despite a vibrant history of incredible players in the NBA, some of the greatest passers of all-time don't even scratch the list of all time triple doubles.  Isaiah Thomas, John Stockton and Steve Nash don't make the list.  These players had a unique ability to pass the ball, but rarely could get 10 assists on the same night they got 10 boards or 10 steals as well?  Only a few special players have done this over the course of several games, Jason Kidd being the last of the modern era players to get over 100 of them in his career.

Choose who you will for MVP because a credible case can be made for every player in the fantastic foursome of MVP candidates.  LeBron has plenty of parts and pieces to work with, but his ability to turn it all into championship quality teamwork is something none of the other MVP candidates could have accomplished. LeBron used to get an occasional triple double himself (7th all-time), but those days are becoming fewer and farther between. LeBron's 36 career triple doubles are a far cry behind Jason Kidd (107) or Magic Johnson (138).


NBA All-Time Triple-Doubles – Regular Season
Rk.PlayerTeam(s)Total# of Yrs
1Oscar RobertsonCincinnati Royals (1960/01 – 1969/70)
Milwaukee Bucks (1970/71 – 1973/74)
18114
2Magic JohnsonLos Angeles Lakers (1979/80 – 1990/91, 1995/96)13813
3Jason KiddDallas Mavericks (1994/95 – 1996/97, 2007/08)
Phoenix Suns (1996/97 – 2000/01)
New Jersey Nets (2001/02 – 2007/08)
Dallas Mavericks (2007/08 – 2011/12)
New York Knicke (2012/13)
10719
4Wilt ChamberlainPhiladelphia Warriors (1959/60 – 1961/62)
San Francisco Warriors (1962/63 – 1964/65)
Philadelphia 76ers (1964/65 – 1967/68)
Los Angeles Lakers (1968/69 – 1972/73)
7814
5Larry BirdBoston Celtics (1979/80 – 1991/92)5913
6Lafayette LeverPortland Trailblazers (1982/83 – 1983/94)
Denver Nuggets (1984/85 – 1989/90)
Dallas Mavericks (1990/91 – 1993/94)
4311
7* LeBron JamesCleveland Cavaliers (2003/04 – 2009/10)
Miami Heat (2010/11 – present)
3611
8John HavlicekBoston Celtics (1962/63 – 1977/78)3016
9Grant HillDetroit Pistons (1994/95 – 1999/00)
Orlando Magic (2000/01 – 2006/07
Phoenix Suns (2007/08 – 2012/13)
2917
10Michael JordanChicago Bulls (1984/85 – 1992/93)
Chicago Bulls (1994/95 – 1997/98)
Washington Wizards (2001/02 – 2002/03)
2815
11Clyde DrexlerPortland Trailblazers (1983/84 – 1994/95)
Houston Rockets (1994/95 – 1997/98)
2515

























































While you could easily vote him MVP every year, I see LeBron's season as the least MVP worthy of the four, but only because we always try to share MVP love whenever first time candidates prove worthy to get a taste.

According to this standard, Stephen Curry and James Harden looked to be neck and neck in the horse race to win a first time award.  With Harden and Curry, their MVP resumes were written early in the season as their teams have lead the western conference race from start to finish. Westbrook, on the other hand, has had to race just to get his team into the race. Is Westbrook unfairly tainted one way or the other by the desperation of his team?  Absent Oklahoma City's other best players (Kevin Durant and Serge Ibaka), Westbrook has been free to be everything for a team that needs everything on every night just to maintain their playoff positioning. Though he is clearly getting every opportunity to stuff the stat sheet, the man is getting triple doubles every night.  Not 50 point games, which some people think is a much harder accomplishment. Triple doubles.

Let's not be confused.  50 points is tough also, which is why NEITHER of these rarities used to happen every night.  Unless your name is Westbrook, the rare triple double is still just as rare as ever.  The main reason why the triple double remains so rare is because it depends on teammates to make the shot.  That doesn't sound like a big deal for pro players, but the coordination of having your team make every shot you pass to them is difficult.  Assuming that they miss a few shots(let's say 50%), you will need twice as many assist attempts to achieve half as much success. Westbrook is recording 10 or more assists at the same time that he's scoring 20 and 30 points himself.  Add to that the double digit rebounds that he's pulling down every night and it gets hard to understand how you vote against him.

I don't give a lot of credence to the MVP vote anyways since sometimes its a lifetime achievement award whereas other times the voting reflects a lifetime underachievement penalty against deserving players with tense media relationships.  Westbrook has typically been that guy, especially during the days when nobody believed he was worthy of taking as many shots as last years MVP, Kevin Durant.  Without a healthy Durant, Westbrook has improved his stack ranking on a team where he was already #2 mainly because his ranking is the entire league is also rising fast.


Young sportswriters might not remember the triple double era and they might not be able to forgo Westbrook's edgy past in lieu of his present and bright future, but there are plenty of MVP voters who do remember watching Magic and Bird..and Fat. Westbrook will depend on these voters to help us all decide if the revival of the triple double era is something worthy of an MVP.  More importantly, is it worthy of forgetting the fact that most media members were so critical of  Westbrook just weeks before he tripled down on the entire league.

LeBron James has logged a few miles, but is still the smartest basketball player on the planet while Stephen Curry has skills with the ball that likely make him the best basketball player.  James Harden is too weak on defense to be the best player, but he is certainly the hardest to cover and is MVP worthy for overcoming Houston's loss of Dwight Howard.  Westbrook has been accused of playing more for triple doubles than victories, but I find it hard to consider any player who consistently achieves a balanced performance as playing more for balance than victories.  10+ points in the NBA are way too easy for Westbrook, but the rebounds and assists come from effort and selflessness.  Those who truly question Westbrook's motives with night after night triple doubles are probably among the group that Russell rubbed the wrong way back in the day.

I would love to see Russell win an MVP just to revive memories of the days of my NBA youth, when triple dubs were often done by the hoop maestro's of the league. Come to think of it, whether he wins an MVP or not, he already has.