Friday, May 29, 2015

Touching Our Guns Drives Many American's Crazy

Guns don't kill people. especially since crazy people will kill with or without guns. I felt the need to clear up the image of guns since gun sales double every time we even hint about weapon laws

James Holmes is crazy.

Not like you and I who all suffer from some level of mental instability at times.  James Holmes is at war with voices in his own head, and the voices took over on one Dark Night.  In his own words- spoken to his own psychologist prior to the Dark Knight movie release that inspired Holmes to color his hair and boobie-trap his apartment with bombs since he would likely die in a hail of bullets- Holmes was losing the war within himself.


Is killing James Holmes the right way
to stop the rise of more crazed killer's?

What could we have learned from
the mind's of Klebold and Harris?
Sentencing that Boston Marathon murderer to death seems agreeable to the blood lust region of the black side of my heart.  Killing Holmes doesn't feel the same for me.  In fact, keeping him locked up in a jail and not a sophisticated psyche ward for crazed killers waiting on justice seems off tilt as well.  Is a police detective or the FBI actually the best first interview for criminals of this sort?

Typically, the kind of gunfire that takes more of our societal purity ends with the death of the gunmen, so exploring the minds of our crazed killers is mostly uncharted seas.  Rarely, to almost never, do we get to explore the mind of a societal rapist' who we think capital punishment will justify.  Is their death and our ignorance truly bliss or can we seek to learn from the minds of terror?

Imagine a chance to talk to Klebold and Harris.  What directions could they give us towards dealing with people like them?  Maybe we could try to convince Holmes to help solve a plot similar to his own by someone with problems similar to his own.  Could an animal find a propensity to protect as even a killer grizzly does at times?  If we saw past the animal that Holmes appears to be, could we learn to help avoid the kind of animal Holmes and others have become?

If we are never able to explore the minds of another domestic terrorist, is it reasonable to at least keep crazy people away from certain tools of death- or monitor them if they purchase one or more of these tools as Holmes did in preparation for that fateful day?  Might many off these same people- especially those already seeking help like Holmes was- actually consent to being monitored during their mental warfare before they're losing too bad to ask anymore?

If that sounds too much like gun control, I apologize to anyone that I've offended.  Your weapons are safe, so please don't double and triple your personal armory whenever you hear the words crazy people and guns in the same conversation.
We're talking about James Holmes kind of crazy.  Not you.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Rand Paul, Hillary Clinton Take Right Road On Iraq

Who is to blame for ISIS?
Isis used to be an inspirational childhood hero.

Well, that requires a trip through time.  You see back in the day, a production group called Filmation was responsible for Isis.  At least they were responsible for The Secret of Isis, a popular Saturday children's show that starred Joanna Cameron as the Mighty Isis, Isis, Isis.

Isis was created to inspire little girls, and Shazam inspired young boys to be positive members of the community.  Time and limited special effects sent most childhood heroes into the realm of animation and into distant memories for me until some evil terror group decided to reignite the name and the memories.  With a problem so complex, we could use the Mighty Isis and Shazam to team up and save the day.  Sometimes complex problems actually required they combine the show's so they both could show up.
Shazam needed a haircut.

It seems very few republicans in Congress have the memory to recall Isis of old, or the path that lead to the ISIS pestering Iraq, Syria and American sensibility.  Filmation may have created the original Isis, but WE all created the recent terror group when we agreed to allow a war hawk party to remain in power and heal us from the anger of 9-11.

At the time, polls consistently favored military action against Hussein while recent polls will tell you that only a third of American's still admit to the angered opinion polls that fed the war hawks and lead US into Iraq in the first place.


Why Voting Matters?

WE had a choice with the re-election of Bush and Cheney but allowed a broken electoral college system and a few hanging chads in Florida to give US exactly what WE deserved.  Elections are still not sacred,  evidenced by the low turnouts,  widespread use of outdated voting methods and machines and voter suppression in all the states that still think they can.

Isis used to be an inspirational hero with mystic powers.  Now, ISIS is an inspirational terror group that gets most of its power from the general fear of US imperialism.  ISIS didn't exist before we invaded Iraq and got rid of Sadaam Hussein because the recruit worthy fear wasn;t nearly as strong as it is now.  WE created that fear when we decided to bomb the hills of Afghanistan chasing a Bin Laden who was long gone and tucked into hiding before even considered our bomb brigade.

The WMD's of Sadaam were a lie, and president Obama's attempt to leave a residual force was rejected by a nation of people more afraid of US than the known evil's they have endured forever.  In many ways, the terror of ISIS is par for the course in a nation that still remains accustomed to the iron fist of Hussein.  Any person that would dare to lead Iraq at this dangerous time is a matyr waiting to be assassinated.  In addition, their previous experience was most likely in leading a small village or city of people, not a nation of violent extreme's.

Republican presidential candidates are one by one tripping over the issue of ISIS and trying their best to blame someone or something other than themselves.  Hillary is the ONLY candidate who nailed this answer to the wall by declaring that SHE got it wrong when it comes to Iraq, eliminating the ability to cross examine her on an issue in which the facts strongly support her answer.

The facts strongly support the recent comment of Rand Paul too, who has squarely placed the decision to invade Iraq (which is what ultimately created ISIS) in the hands of the GOP whom he described as war hawks who won't stop and measure the impact of such choices.  This is truth that will not endear him to many of his own during this march towards whittling the growing field of republican presidential candidates.  Millions of Americans are openly and silently applauding Paul for the courage of these words, but few of this crowd will help him win a republican primary.

Eventually, some of these revisionist politicians will be held to account for their cloudy view of history.  The wrong answer on war- past present and future- will not disqualify you from running for president, but it could easily disqualify you from winning.  American's may not be clear about what exactly to do about ISIS, however, we are certain that more of the same is a highly suspect answer to the question.

There is something to be said for politicians who understand the value of change and have the ability and humility to admit past failures with a clear vision, instead of wearing a clearly wrong decision as a badge of stubborn pride.

Well done Rand Paul.  From a moral stance, you've done this nation proud. Too bad it won't garner you anything of political value.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Return Of The King Forces Warriors To Look Ahead



Pimping is said to be difficult-  but it can't be much harder than closing out a series with a sweep in the NBA semi-finals.  That's the kind of thing only king's do well. Golden State, behind MVP Steph Curry, is a really good team. This team can truly play defense and crash the boards with the best of them, and at times they appear to be a team even LeBron can't handle.  They will need to be all of that and more tonight since the Cleveland Cavalier closeout should add the same pressure to Golden State that Golden State's closeout of Memphis added to the Clipper's.


What happened to the Clippers ? Kevin McHale and Golden State?

If the Houston Rockets are trying to duplicate their unlikely triumph over the L.A. Clippers, spotting Golden State a 3-0 lead was a great way to do it.  They might have gotten off of the snide by avoiding a sweep, but they've still got to do it again, and again, and again if they hope to be watched during the finals.  Most likely, Houston will watch the finals as spectators just like the rest of us. However, they just got the same free agent addition that they received at the end of the Clipper series.


The agent is doubt from a Warrior team who is already starting to wonder if they can actually beat a rested LeBron- and free because such doubt won't cost Houston a dime. Golden State should have never forced Curry to return to the lineup after his nasty spill, but pressure causes missteps.  If Curry needed a rest in game 5, the decision to force him back in game 4 made the game 5 decision for you.

Looking Ahead?

For a while, the Clippers were the story of the NBA playoffs after beating the defending champs and going up 3-1 to the Rockets.  Suddenly. the resting Golden State Warrior team joined the Houston Rockets cause by adding "we're waiting for you" pressure to the equation.  With a 19 point lead and a clear path to the Bay Area, the destraction became too much to bear, especially since the resting and waiting Warriors appeared unbeatable anyway.

Cleveland's sweep could be the opportunity that Kevin McHale needs to pull off his post season magic once again..  NO ONE thought Houston could do it without the services of guard Patrick Beverley, who went down at the the end of the regular season- or without their alMost Valuable Player James Harden, who sat on the bench during the magical 19 point, come from behind victory against L.A. that launched the Rockets into the next series.  They did it, and from the looks of things, even if Dwight Howard loses a game or worse from trying to free himself from Bogut- or worse, Terrence Jones at center could be the right way to go since Howard's limited offensive ability and inability to make free-throws on a consistent basis has turned him into a real liability in the 4th quarter.

By the way!

Tristen Thompson could be putting his name in the hat for top center in the league after this outstanding playoff season.

Hack-A-Howard  .vs. Hack-A-Dre .vs. Hack-A-Josh

While I am now rooting for Kevin McHale and his Rockets (if my team is out- give me the underdog everytime), I am not a fan of the intentional foul (a.k.a, Hack-A-Shaq).  In fact, I really wonder if it even currently fits inside of the rules of the game, Every foul typically demands a play at the ball and not at the head or legs when a player actually has  the ball.  On every level of basketball, fouls that are intentional but not directed at the ball will typically invoke some version of a flagrant foul, much like it does in the final 2 minutes of the NBA. How can we ever justify and allow intentionally fouling a player who doesn't have the ball  and call it a good rule or good basketball?  While I can't understand how the rule gets allowed throughout the game, every team that does the tactic at least deserves shame and bad luck if you ask me.

It seems like a simple fix to force ALL intentional foul's to be allowed ONLY while making a reasonable attempt at the  ball being held by the player holding or receiving the basketball.  If such a modification goes into play, fouls against these horrible shooting post players will only happen when those players have the ball.  This is important because RIGHT NOW, team's choosing to foul often mitigate their approach by selecting teammates with minimal fouls to do the dirty work.  If off-ball fouling gets corrected, teams will no longer have the luxury of doing it with minimal risks.

Hack-A-Shaq doesn't seem to ever give good kharma to the team's that do it anyway. Nonetheless, despite having players that have endured this tactic all season/career long, the Rockets and the Clippers chose to do it towards each other.  You would think that the teams with a Shaq (or whatever) would be more sensitive to the low brow approach that others have taken against them.

Obviously that's not true.

I have a soft spot for great coaching, so I am pulling for McHale, and generally I am a West Coast guy since my Denver Nuggets are a Western Conference team,  but I have a hard time expecting good sports kharma from any team that tries to win a title through off the ball intentional fouls. From my best recollection, every team that did the Hack-A-Shaq lost to Shaq.

Make Your FreeThrows Kids
;That being said, if the league doesn't change the Hack-A-Shaq, I can live with that too because you already can't get away with it in the final 2 minutes, and kids really need a graphic example of the vital importance of making or missing freethrows.  Crappy post season freethrow shooting has been a leaguewide horror flick, and it's not only Dwight Howard and DeAndre Jordan with the problem.

Ain't that right Josh Smith?

#7 Might Not Be So Lucky

Houston's two Achilles heel's, Josh Smith and Dwight Howard, are likely to cost the Rockets in the end, no matter how far the Rockets rise.  A rested LeBron is surely enough pressure to make a team that's never been there before tighten up.  Without question, the Warriors must dominate game 5.  A loss in game 5 comes with a virtual guaranteed loss in game 6 at Houston as well. and #7 might not be so lucky if it goes that far.

#7 Might Not Be So Lucky

The biggest problem with making yourself believe that you are a contender when you really are not is that it totally delays the process of realizing and pursuing the truth.  The Denver Nuggets were not really close to winning anything when they had Carmelo, and they moved even further away after he left, despite the illusion that 57 wins and a Coach of The Year create. These Nuggets have NEVER seen a sniff of the top pick because they've only recently come to recognize the value of sucking for a while to smell what big time losing provides.

This year's #7  might be the unluckiest of them all.  Why?  The Nuggets own it.

The last 7 at #7 have been more good than bad.  Maybe even some greatness at 7.  

2014  #7 Julius Randle  UNC            - Lakers
2013  #7 Harrison Barnes  UNC       - GS
2012  #7 Greg Monroe  Georgetown - Detroit
2011  #7  Bismack Biyombo   Congo - SAC
2010  #7  Stephen Curry Davidson    - GS
2009  #7  Eric Gordon   - Indiana       - LAC
2008  #7  Corey Brewer - Florida       -MIN

It could be a good pick, if my Nuggets weren't still looking for a coach, presumably one that might impress the front office more than interim coach Melvin Hunt does.  Brian Shaw was really no different than Melvin Hunt relative to his experience as a head coach, but he had name recognition.  If the Nuggets have chosen not to lock up Hunt as their next coach, its because they are, once again, waiting for another coach with a name, not one who clearly connects and can develop a team of up and coming players.

The problem with chasing big names is that it assumes that any recognizable coach will trust coaching for a team that got rid of George Karl after a 57 win, Coach of The Year effort, and won't hire an interim who did everything you hoped he could do.  Shaw's failures might have removed the Karl cloud from above our next head coach, but any smart person must know to tread lightly with a front office that is more focused on the fish they would like to take the bait and not at the bait at all.

News Flash:

An up and coming coach is the right choice for an up and coming team.

These Nuggets need to lock up Melvin Hunt and give up that #7 to go up or down from that spot to get a player that doesn't need so much development.  Keeping #7 means that the list of young Nuggets who need developing will only grow after next season unless we get a sure fire pick, or one that we won't need to develop so much while Jusuf Nurkic, Erick Green and Garry Harris prove their value.  Frank Kaminsky should do just fine at 15 or 20.

 Kaminsky has a lot of Kevin McHale in his game.
Is Frank Kaminsky the NBA draft sleeper?
This Nugget fan hopes he is, for our sake.


I have already confessed my support for coach Kevin McHale, the guy who took out the other coach that I was rooting for, Doc Rivers. I'm a coach. What can I say?  I was also always a big McHale fan as a kid, especially when I discovered Larry Bird was quite the jerk. I encountered Bird's  Boston Celtics when they borrowed our high school gym prior to a game against my Denver Nuggets.  McHale was awesome, and his kindness and post moves have stayed with me for years.  I still utilize a couple of his baseline pivot moves whenever I get a chance to act like a basketball player, although I typically credit Jack Sikma because his name sounds cooler to say.

7 game series?

Bleak seems to be the exact temperature that these Rockets perform best under, as if losing the weight of expectation allows them to takeoff.  If this Rocket is losing fuel, McHale's championship history could become the power source for this series like it was in the last. It is reasonable to expect an up against the wall Houston team to fight, maybe even steal a game in the Bay area as they nearly did in the first two games.   This series still feels like a 6 or 7 game brawl to me that sets the Western conference up to deal with the well rested Cavs.

Aside from the damage they might inflict upon each other before it's over, both western conference teams would be worthy opponents for LeBron, maybe even favored over him- yet both teams are young and new at all this, so neither will win a crown without a world class brawl, most likely one for the ages.  If Golden State can actually win the west without a 7 game series (which I doubt), they almost certainly won't have the experience to beat LeBron's Cavaliers in less than 7 games.

Either way, buckle your seatbelts for the kind of NBA basketball that makes you need to sit and watch for 4 quarters.

Finally!

Thursday, May 21, 2015

What The Flop Is The NBA Doing Fining Steph?

What the flop is the NBA thinking fining Steph Curry for flopping?



First of all, the rule that instituted fining people who choose to flop was a stupid rule to begin with.  Not that I didn't appreciate the league's attempt to keep Manu Ginobli from making me turn the channel until the part of the game when flops get ignored so that ref's don't dictate outcomes. The idea was beyond admirable, and my initial response came with an equal level of appreciation and trepidation when the rule came to be.  The trepidation, however, comes from the difficulty with determining a flop in the first place.


Some Dude's (Me) Hack Too Much

I've personally stopped playing a lot of organized basketball simply because of the referee problem that makes it difficult for guys like me.  While I admit to being one of the most skilled fouler's in the history of fouling, I also have never intentionally flopped.  I have come to accept that shooting and flopping are not easy to do at the same time if you have any hope of making the shot. Despite the high double digit fouling that I intentionally get away with every single game that I play, I rarely foul out of games.  On the other hand, since I don't understand the flop technique and usually absorb contact without major shot disruption, I often get fouled without getting the calls I deserve.  In the grand scheme of things, it all probably balances out in the end.

You see, the problem with this whole flopping debate is that most really good referee's do not lean towards the heavy whistle side of basketball, especially in the NBA playoffs or old men basketball leagues when physicality amps up a bit.  If basketball game officials chose to keep the whistle blowing in concert with the increased level of fouls in the playoffs, then the game would hardly be watchable.

In last nights Cavs .vs. Hawks game, I watched LeBron James drive to the whole with 3 dudes draped all over him on multiple occasions. No foul called.  In fact, the only real hope that even LeBron, the best player in the world, has of getting a foul called during late game action is to flop a bit.  Taking the foul strongly and focusing on finishing is a formula for getting the field goal, but not the "and one" or the two shot foul you probably deserve,

To Steph Curry's credit, he is paying $5,000 for a flop that really did happen, but not for the reason's that some guy's do it.  Steph is a reactionary flopper in that he focuses on the shot, and falls away from the contact because small guys better fall away just to minimize the bangs and bruises that come with being great.  If I were playing against Curry, I would have to assume he's shooting jump shots, and be near to poke, prod and manipulate his pre and post shot, until he becomes uncomfortable.

In other words, I would foul his arse as much as I could get away with.  Such an approach is not novel.  It is the only hope you have against these type of players.  Conversely, flopping or accentuating the contact is the only hope that such players have to shine a light on the extra that goes on when stars shoot the ball.  If you watch the play, Steph pushes off on Corey Brewer in order to gain the free look, and then gets brushed against the arm from a player trailing the action.  With this player coming from the trail side, his near block of Curry forced the contact that lead to Curry's $5,000 flop.

To the NBA's credit, they've warned players of these potential fines over a year ago, so anyone who pays has very little room to point fingers.  Actually, they could point fingers at the hundreds of players who continue to flop without penalty and ask the question of, why me? Why so sporadic in the enforcement of the rules and why would you decide to open blind eyes on this season's MVP, especially on a less than obvious flop?

There is a statement in this particular fine, but its neither clear or for Curry alone.




Wednesday, May 20, 2015

"First Shall Be Last" Leaves Media Mad At Hillary

The last shall be first and the first shall be last.

No, this isn't about religion, God, church or even anything particularly spiritual.  This is nothing more than the approach that Hillary has taken as she works to pursue the presidency following an unbeaten trail.  As she skates her way around the travails of campaigns, it might be worth investigating if the Clinton foundation has enough global connection to engineer earthquakes in Nepal, train wrecks in Philly and meltdown's in L.A., taking the spotlight off of Hillary and confirming that the Clippers are still just the Clippers. Stop smiling Donald Sterling!

Today's non-Hillary news cycle tells about a 'Son's of Anarchy' like flash mob shootout in Texas in which 9 people died at the scene, with 18 others hospitalized. Meanwhile back in the newsroom, every news person has their eyes locked on television sets wondering who will be the FIRST network to get the Hillary exclusive, or will Hillary continue to stiff the media who keeps insisting that she can't get away with such an approach....can she?

In the past, being the first was a really big deal in the news business.  Not a whole lot has changed in regard to gaining exclusive interviews, but a lot has changed as it relates to access.  When the news media was the only method for getting your message delivered, the demand of catering to their invasive behavior loomed large.  Now that Obama's Hope message (and internet approach towards delivery) Changed the game of politics, Hillary is following his lead and refining the model as well.

At Last!
Has month's of negative news actually
worked in the favor of Hillary Clinton?

Obama was the first to take his message to the average Joe or JoAnn when he began granting interviews to non-traditional media sources- the last if you will- after long absences from traditional media outlets.  Lately, unless you are a presidential candidate with common desperation for traditional media outlets. it seems the last might be the first and the most likely connection that Hillary (our next POTUS frontrunner) makes with America during her campaign. As the traditional news reporters are watching the TV universe, the exclusive is more likely to first appear on Twitter'verse.  Even the emails from her private server won't be released until 2016, a pace that the State Department will now dictate removing her from control of the release or culpability with further delay.

Who's To Blame?

News rooms with multiple screens blaring multiple news sources all at once are just as culpable to the demise of American politics as the proliferation of dirty money, especially in the eyes of Hillary who is pointing her admonition in both directions.  When you keep a watch on the news like news reporters do, there becomes a certain inevitability to certain proceedings.  Inevitably, all politicians have to endure the heat from the media as their litmus test of viability and their access to the news cycle. Except Hillary.  Whether she wants the exposure or not, only death and disaster can pull her from the top of every news program.

Yesterday, according to her liking and planning, Hillary gave a few reporters an opportunity at a few questions, just so she can place perfectly contained and packaged messages on Iraq and her emails into the recent news cycle. Unlike several republican presidential candidates recently, Hillary did not struggle to deliver a concise message that will calm the flames from reporter's burning to put the heat on Hillary. Every question had a thorough and concise response that will replay like magic for the guaranteed soundbites that news stations need from Hillary.

Hillary has never struggled in the face of media, but this Hillary is seemingly content and intent on changing the way we do politics in America which includes finishing the immigration problem once and for all.  Since Hispanic America will soon dictate a lot politically, a president who is truly prepared to win a general election without a plan for immigration is somewhat laughable. Only Jeb Bush seems to be aware of the joke so many republicans are making of their candidacy while trying to establish a platform of second class citizenship for immigrants.  Tracking back to the center on immigration after the primary is a dead tactic that will not survive the voting booth if pro-immigration voters are leery of a president who is not supportive of our nation for immigrants.

For all of our social flaws, too many reasonable people remain in America for unreasonable presidents to get elected anymore. The presidential press core has relegated themselves into the category of unreasonably desperate to be first instead of being fair or accurate and not appearing angry simply because of lack of access.  In the news business, if you can't get the first interview, you try to be the first to cause a fumble, which is the ultimate goal of every news station that chases after exclusive interviews and exclusive sound bites in the first place.  YouTube and Twitter don't allow for question and answer, and are simply not exclusive enough for the mainstream media to control the message or ruffle the messenger.  Hillary has decided that her need for notoriety is not the same as her need to share a message, which can be done these days via YouTube or Twitter.  She has all the notoriety a presidential candidate could need. However, if she was short on notoriety, her current posture of conscientious dissent against the media is indirectly giving her more media coverage than she could have otherwise dreamed of.
John Podesta; The man behind Obama is now
behind Hillary Clinton too. Is he too powerful?

Every word she speaks now becomes instant lead off news just as her silence has been as well.  When she needs to make definitive statements on important matters of significance, she does it in the midst of a scheduled event (rather presidential if you ask me) and keeps it moving without questions. News outlets that continue to anger themselves with not being the first, seem the last to recognize how they are being used as a tool for the Clinton's, of the Clinton's and by the Clinton's, who have enough support in the media realm to absorb the saliva from the wolves, hungry to get any taste of Hillary that they can, even a subordinate if necessary.

Hillary will probably duke it out with Jeb in the finals, but no one will ever throw political punches quite the way Hillary is throwing them right now.  Call her the Mayweather of politics if you will because her approach is totally defensive.  Thanks to Obama, she won't have the unblemished record of Mayweather, but she also won't have the main political opponent capable of beating her in the way either, since he's retiring under limited terms and seems poised to support Hillary's campaign.  Left in Obama's wake is a manner of politicking that Hillary has observed closely.  In some ways, she and Bill helped to shape the Obama doctrine that will gain a New Testament if Hillary continues with her coronation.

In fact, whether she wins or not, Hillary is already forcing anyone who hopes to beat her to adopt or counter the kind of change that potentially remakes our game called politics, since campaign finance reform, immigration, wage disparity and now drug addictions are all hot button Hillary issues.  For that, she's won already.

Whatever she's doing to the media right now is purely a bonus.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Kharma Writes Stories and Wins Game 4 For LeBron

And then there were none.

Is LeBron his own dynasty, or is Cleveland attempting
the impossible? Winning in a small market?
With the fall of the San Antonio Spurs, the age of the NBA dynasties has almost come to an end.  If you count the fact that LeBron is struggling as I write to take down the Chicago Bulls just for a chance to overcome the Washington Wizards or the Atlanta Hawks, then its safe to say that none of the remaining teams are cut from championship pedigree.

The moment I typed these words, LeBron drove to the lane against the Bulls to cut into their double digit lead that they took into the fourth quarter of game 4.  Win this game and the Bulls take a strangle hold over the series (3-1) and start the process of returning Chicago to the realm of champion, despite distant memories from their dynastic days of old.

This season, all signs point towards the rise of the "Have Not's", teams from small market cities that typically were believed to be incapable of winning a championship.  Maybe Chicago or the LA Clippers will win and keep the theory intact, but their franchises are among the many in the league fighting to rise to relevancy too.  Even if the Clippers (big city) or the Cavs (LeBron's team) can win a title this season, hope still springs eternal for lowly cities like Denver that have never proven themselves to be capable of reaching the peak of the NBA.

While my heart has moved into the corner of supporting NBA legend Doc Rivers this playoff season, the only other championship mind capable of dealing with the championship experience of LeBron, I wouldn't be sad if the Warriors lay siege or the Wizards cast  a spell of hope for the rest of us secondary sports cities like Denver to build on.  With a capable front office, anything is possible.  Whether or not Denver's front office qualifies as capable is the only question left unanswered for this hopeful fan looking for a reason to believe.  The Nuggets' next few moves will reveal a lot.  In the mean time, I have to watch this Cav's versus Bulls game and wonder if losing Timofey Mosgov and J.R. Smith was good in the long run, or is LeBron so good that he makes even these ex-Nuggets look like stars?

Before I could complete two paragraphs of thought, LeBron has erased the Chicago lead, and is making Smith and Mosgov look like Parish and Ainge as he carries them towards greatness.  I expect LeBron to find a way to win this game and keep the Bulls in the state of figuring things out- which might mean firing Tom Thibideau at the end of this season.  Thibideau is actually the only other coach that I would take in Denver aside from Nuggets interim coach Melvin Hunt, still in the hunt for a permanent tag in Denver.

As I write, J.R. Smith just nailed another long range 3 in response to one scored by the Bulls, giving the Cavaliers a 3 point lead with 5 minutes to play.  James blocks a shot that Mosgov recovered and then set Mosgov up with a pick and roll dunk   He missed of course, but nailed the two free throws from being fouled.  In game 3, Mosgov only missed one free throw, and for all of the things he struggled with in Denver, he was an improving free throw shooter.  As I typed these two sentences, Mosgov followed his two freebies with a defensive rebound, and offensive rebound and a put back for a 7 point lead.

Timeout Chicago.

Cleveland might win it with LeBron doing what he does, but they are the Cavaliers of small city Cleveland. A victory by this team makes small city hoops more possible than ever, so even the magic that LeBron keeps doing works in favor of the little guys.  After a really good defensive play that produced a foul from the Bulls, J.R. Smith shoved the same Bulls player, giving up a technical free throw and reminding me why we don't really miss J.R.  On the next possession, Mosgov got one of those wide open layups that he often misses.  He missed the shot, reminding me why we don't really miss Mosgov that much either.

With the clock winding down quickly, LeBron misses another 3 point shot (he has hardly made any during the series), and Derrick Rose heads down court to show King James how its done, knocking down a 3 pointer to close this pivotal game to a 3 point margin.  How did the King respond?  With a muscle drive to the hole for an easy 2 points.  Rose advances up the court trying to match LeBron shot for shot, and gets fouled by a Cavalier team unwilling to let him do it freely.

Rose hits both freebies.

When the King can't hit a jumpers, it's not hard to guess what he will do instead, so Joakim Noah did just that when he guessed right on the next Cavalier possession, drawing an offensive foul on James destined to get to the hole.  Despite the turnover, the Cavs got a stop and had one minute and LeBron James to finish off an important game.  This time down, the Bulls fouled an attacking LeBron and he nailed both freebies for a 5 point lead.  With 27 seconds left in the game, Jimmy Butler nails a 3 point bucket to try and salvage the biggest game in the series for his team.  Win the game and you cripple the King.  Lose it and he inspires his henchmen to take you out.  Guaranteed. If LeBron doesn't get you, the depression of such a lost will do it for him

Bulls use their last time out to create a plan.

3 seconds separate the game and shot clock, and Noah informs the ref that they will not play to foul, so hold tight to that whistle. A strong double team on J.R. causes him to take a timeout with 19 seconds on the clock.  Though the Bulls have no time outs with one left for the Cavs, until more great defense on the in-bounds forces the Cavs to use their last timeout without taking a second off of the clock.  These Bulls saw red and the Cavs were it.  With a long inbound pass to LeBron that he catches in half court corner, the Bulls double team too, forcing LeBron into another offensive foul and a turnover. With a sudden sign of life, Rose takes the ball end to end to tie the game and force the play back to LeBron.

There are no timeouts left and very little time on the clock as LeBron makes his hesitation drive at the lane.  When he was a younger man, he would have dunked on Noah who put a hand on his shoulder to stop the expected dunk. The refs swallowed their whistle forcing the King to use 1.5 seconds in regulation to decide it.  He was clearly fouled on the play, but the uncertainty of when the ball got knocked  of bounds gave both teams one last chance to huddle up as referee's checked video to correct the shot clock.

In my mind, hoop kharma writes these stories for you, and kharma usually goes in favor of those who've paid their dues in the past.  LeBron has won it before, but he also has a lot of tears from those years when he didn't win.  Those are the tears that carry you over the top in moments that matter.

James hit the shot at the buzzer.  Series tied 2-2.

Maybe all the years of bad hair has hurt Rickie's kharma?
PostScript:  Kharma told me that Rickie Fowler was going to rush from behind to win the Players championship today even though he was 5 shots back when I felt the premonition and turned to watch the Cavs/Bulls finish.  By the time I turned the channel back to The Players, Fowler was in a three-way playoff with Sergio Garcia and Kevin Kisner.  Garcia has a lot of kharma out there on the course, but nothing compares to 2014 for Fowler.  I'm predicting Fowler wins just so I can pat myself on the back for having kharmic awareness.  He's left a lot of tears out on the course over the years
.

 

Mother's Day Reminds Us To Listen To Our Mother's

Today is more than Mother's Day, it is a day of fellowship.

Weekends often bring along the call of fellowship; a command that is a tricky thing because it assumes interaction with others despite our lack of control in such matters. Since life seems to determine for us who we interact with each day, I believe every human interaction is potentially a God ordained fellowship.  In other words,waiting to fellowship on weekends minimizes its value. In fact, some of my greatest days of church have been just me, alone with the Spirit.

Last Sunday was one of those memorable services in which I found myself considering the power of my isolated fellowship, much like what I imagine when I think of some of history's great leaders, who often found themselves locked up without their consent.  Ghandi, MLK, Jesus Christ.  Each endured isolated moments in which they were forced to fellowship with the spirit when opposing forces attempted to separate them from the ability to fellowship in the flesh. Some consider the greatest impact of their ministries to be the parts which occurred during imprisonment. Sometimes, isolated moments of fellowship bring about deep great thoughts that connect you to the same spirit that inspired the worlds great deep thinkers....


.....and sometimes the spirit ministers through off-beat 1980's music.

Do we still have paperboys?

Born in 1969, I grew up in love with the video age because it was so new and exciting and enticing to my curious pre-teen mind.  Little did I realize that it would lead me to hate the sight of newspapers- the source of my first love in life, writing.  I almost lost my mind when some convincing salesperson recently talked my wife into receiving orange bags on the porch each morning once again, as if there is something other than advertisements that I hadn't already read before the paperboy finishes his route each day. These days, those bagged papers are nothing but a sign that a family is out of town, so I will be cancelling the delivery before the Spring/Summer travel season arrives.

The point of all of this is the  extremely powerful prophecy that bounced inside my head in the form of "Video Killed The Radio Star" by the Buggles.  No, I did not remember this 80's music groups name without the help of Google, nor did I know that their somewhat famous song actually was released in 1979 when I was 10 years old and my family had finally gotten cable television and MTV. I also did not realize that some new aged group called the Penatonix did a remake of the song until my kids started to sing along when I thought I was educating them about 80's music. My wife is the same age as I am, so I instantly assumed that she would remember the song and forget the artist just as I had, but she didn't remember the group at all. When I pulled it up on YouTube, it came to me that Will-I-Am and Nicki Minaj had also borrowed the intro as the same intro to their smash hit, "Check It Out".  Computers and cable TV certainly have globalized televised media, but video was destined to slowly destroy our willingness to listen and hear, spelling the doom of radio and those orange bagged things I keep stepping on in my yard.

For some people, upside your head momma is the answer
and not just a symptom of the same fear that other blacks have.
Prior to televised video imaging, families had to read to understand the world or listen to a radio broadcast, taking time to hear sound and listen for meaning.  Video killed the radio star when it ruined our desire and capacity to hear and actually listen.  With video, we often add catchy music, but there is no duty to even turn up or include the original sound.  When it's time to understand what's happening, we often allow commentators and narrators to fill in the blanks or paraphrase the purpose and intent, even if they don't have a clue what they are saying.

Such is the case with 'upside your head' momma in Baltimore.  This frightened mother inadvertently elevated herself into a deeper meaning- maybe even a solution of sorts- so her name isn't as significant as her deed.  What she appeared to do on video was to stop her misbehaving son from being a part of the problem in Baltimore.  Violence is not an answer to problems, although her violent reaction to her son's stupidity seemed to create a viral video reaction that most news stations found a way to applaud.

What the news, or very few of us have done, is listened to the mother and her son instead of assuming we recognize the story that the video keeps telling us.  What looks like a mom trying to keep her son from being a problem child is actually a desperately afraid mother who said she did not want her son to be the next Freddie Gray.

SHE DID NOT WANT HER SON TO DIE NEEDLESSLY LIKE SO MANY OTHERS HAVE.

Baltimore police have already admitted to arresting Gray falsely just because they felt a sense of suspicion when he decided to run away upon making EYE contact with police.  Upside your head momma had a son deliberately throwing rocks at police.  In her mind, why would her son receive anything less than what run away Freddie Gray endured? The eyes are the windows into each of our souls, and through them isn't just a view of who we truly are, but an access point for who we shall become.  The eyes pre-programmed the souls of these Baltimore police officers who pursued Freddie Gray and denied him medical attention because they had seen run away black criminals in Baltimore before, and they proceeded to the ultimate conclusion that this fleeing black man was worthy of losing man's most sacred right, freedom and ultimately life.

At this point in these proceedings, angry Baltimore blacks have seen too many replays of Freddie Gray- or Eric Garner who was killed while selling cigarette singles on the streets of New York during a recession- or Michael Brown Jr. who was shot dead and left for hours in the street from misbehaving during a police shake down. Occasionally, we  all are susceptible to mistaken images and tainted perceptions, like the one that happened recently when a fleeing suspect in Baltimore dropped a gun that went off. No one was hurt or shot, but angry citizens started to film and confront the situation under the assumption that another Freddie Gray had just begun- even to the extent of getting squarely in the face of law officers they believed to have shot the suspect.

 In Ferguson, officer Darren Wilson was not charged for killing Michael Brown Jr. because he functioned within the manner in which his training allowed.  What he never gave us was a real explanation for the shake down of two black boys that he didn't suspect of any particular crime.  Why did he stop them in the first place, and why so aggressively if not to make them sit like criminals while he checked for warrants?  This shake down practice is an illegal but common behavior among Ferguson cops; a practice that the DOJ report says was allowed and encouraged by superiors in the Ferguson PD.  For the DOJ to hold Wilson responsible for a Ferguson shake down would have required ignoring that police forces are doing similar revenue generating bigotry all across America, not just in Missouri.

Full Ferguson Report .pdf link.

(excerpt from page 20 of Ferguson report)

Many of the unlawful stops we found appear to have been driven, in part, by an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending. Several incidents suggest that officers are more concerned with issuing citations and generating charges than with addressing community needs. In October 2012, police officers pulled over an African-American man who had lived in Ferguson for 16 years, claiming that his passenger-side brake light was broken. The driver happened to have replaced the light recently and knew it to be functioning properly. Nonetheless, according to the man’s written complaint, one officer stated, “let’s see how many tickets you’re going to get,” while a second officer tapped his Electronic Control Weapon (“ECW”) on the roof of the man’s car. The officers wrote the man a citation for “tail light/reflector/license plate light out.” They refused to let the man show them that his car’s equipment was in order, warning him, “don’t you get out of that car until you get to your house.” The man, who believed he had been racially profiled, was so upset that he went to the police station that night to show a sergeant that his brakes and license plate light worked. 

 For those who've allowed their eyes to blind their souls into defending bad cops instead of rooting them out, the Ferguson report is both damning and justifying at the same time.  The very normal practice of police shake down has been squarely documented against the Ferguson PD, yet the lack of prosecution for Darren Wilson has become a battle cry for those who often say,

"Read The Report" as if the part that kept officer Wilson out of prison is the only important section of the entire document.

They clearly must be saying, read the parts of the report that reveal the difficulty with prosecuting people who serve and protect.  Policing demands advocates that won't allow the institution to be colored by its bad apples, although good cops have never run from the call of duty or embraced the negative image created by their ill-behaved brethren. Cop hatred is not new and neither is the associative guilt or lack thereof from good cops who simply have never allowed cop hatred to keep them from the call of policing. The captured video of Freddie Gray's last moments of freedom and life told enough of a story to charge 6 Baltimore cops with a crime; something difficult to achieve, just not as hard as a conviction.

The Message Behind The Video

Thanks to a nosy television camera, upside your head momma is the new poster child for the calibrating of black youth because she appears to be doing what not enough other blacks are doing, since so many young black people take to the streets with rocks  to help a peaceful protest evolve into an angry riot at these moments.  Television flaunts the kid and his mom as the survivor and his savior instead of hearing that she was afraid of him being another victim of one of those trigger happy, ill-behaved police brethren that exist in police forces across the land.  In other words, video intended to expose and reveal the degenerates uncovered this mother's only son of 6 kids.  His face was covered for discretion sake, but a momma knows her baby and gets frozen with fear when his life is in danger.  Her violent reaction of anger was simply a mother's plea of love that, fortunately, the son recognized for exactly what it was, while the world let the head smacking video and a self serving media narrate it for them.

Even as this mom and son worked the television circuit from the sheer popularity of it all, no one seemed to hear say that she was just as fearful of the police as her son was in response to this moment.  Without his mask, her son became a black life that matters. When he talked, it was obvious that he was a really good kid. Few seem to hear that this really good kid was doing what a lot of really good and scared kids do when they don't know how to deal with anger. According to his own mom, this kid didn't have confrontations with police (probably because of a watchful mother), but friends of his who didn't deserve aggressive policing havd. A few didn't live to talk about it.  When you are bred in a culture that witnesses the negative impact of police profiling, your eyes become the windows to your soul and color your perspective accordingly.

Before the mass video era, we didn't have the ability to fully kill the message before it got delivered.  We might not have totally agreed with what we were hearing, but we listened.  Like a seed, any unfamiliar thought can be planted inside of an open or objective mind. Political polarization isn't new, though it has grown with the growth of 20 second video attacks that program our presumptive minds to believe unfair assumptions instead dismantling half truths with the scrutiny of skepticism.  Skepticism might be rampant, but hearing and listening instead of falling for video illusions is not- thus we often find ourselves watering the seeds of our own illusions.


Fellowship Means Hearing, Listening and Sharing

Within the process of fellowship, the seeds of change get watered through the act of hearing and listening. Thoughts often get planted inside each of us from things we read and hear, however, the ones that grow to eventually change us demand water. Fellowship waters our seeds and allows people to water one another. Absent water, we all dry up and die- which is why God sent his only begotten son to dwell within his people as a new church of sorts- a fellowship of two with direct access to the water of life.

No person was made to only receive water and never share it with others, even if the freshest taste seems to come from quiet places and isolated fellowships.  Eventually, God gives more water than you can keep to yourself anyway.  Like the water from the words of 'upside your head' momma.  She is the hero who seems to have shown us all the answer, but was only blessed to see her son on TV while cursed to have to figure out what she thinks a wayward boy needs- a curse that many single mothers endure when THE father is not around to do it.

I say THE father, with capital letters, because lots of us grew up with step dads and still found ourselves ripping and running the streets.  Both my real father and my step father have passed away, but I only have interactive memories of my step dad, and none of them involved popping me upside my head for the kind of stuff that deserved a good pop, including occasional rock throwing.  My mom, however, fought tooth and nail, including an occasional smack on the head,  to keep her son's away from death by cop or otherwise. Her hit lost its sting long before my teenage years, but my brothers and I didn't have the heart to tell her.  Nonetheless, we are alive today thanks to her willingness to try whatever she thought would work.

Momma's Hand?....where is Daddy?

 Momma's love certainly has a way of influencing your actions even when momma's hand loses its sting. With all of the love and respect due to momma, only a kids real father ever gets to comfortably spank them, and these days, that too has become highly unfavorable.  If this video included anything other than a woman's hand, the criticism against the actions might be more pronounced.  Absent a deep anthropological analysis, I will venture to say that most kids who are raised by their own father don't find themselves in the street during riots, or confused about respecting police (another blog for another day). Momma's hand certainly has a role in rearing healthy young black men, but its probably not upside his hard head. That is always a move a last resort and desperation.

If the answer to teen rioting in Baltimore is actually a timely parental butt kicking (which can work in the short term), then what would the narrative sound like if this same mother hadn't been watching television and she didn't make it before something awful happened to her really good, but misbehaving child?  How would we view the exact same mother if the challenge of single parenthood didn't give time for her intervention, and something happened with her son? What if this momma didn't snatch off that mask and humanize her only son for the world to see differently, would we hear his voice?  Would he still be one of those thug kids or did her smack magically cure someone who, moments before, deserved no empathy or sympathy since he was just another thug?  Would anybody hear the voice of this mother if her son ended up dead from his aggression towards cops? She came to the rescue of  her son, yet no one is listening to why. Does it really take embarrassment and shame from mom for us to recognize the humanity of this child?
What about the kids whose momma didn't come for them?

This mother hen was protecting her son from the cops, not for the cops, while her son was simply hoping his rocks would speak louder than the silent voices of other young black youths like him, no longer alive to speak for themselves.

The video delivers a message, but it doesn't tell the story. Today is more than Mother's Day, it is a day of fellowship.

So who's listening? 

Friday, May 8, 2015

Brady's DeflatGate Response? Poor Performance So Far

Wells Report Is Finally Released.
The hottest scandal in America, DeflateGate, has finally issued a report, an in true Washington style juris prudence, millions of dollars have been spent just to tell us what we already knew, that Tom Brady is a jerk, and he "most likely" did it.

Before today, I hesitated to explain why this "Gate"  is the only "Gate" deserving of the label, and how the outcome was soon to become as disappointing as Ferguson was to so many.  That was before today, or shall I say before Dan Patrick put the heat on Tom Brady in a way he won't easily recover from.

Actually, Patrick's heat was on the designated mouthpiece for the Brady camp, agent Don Yee.  Yee did a great job throughout most of yesterday's release of the Ted Wells report, bouncing from station to station making it clear that the evidence in the report does not give direct accusation- only indirect assumption based upon a preponderance of the evidence.

Translated, the league will fine you $25,000 and additional penalties if you are CLEARLY guilty of this particular offense.  If you are only LIKELY to be guilty as the report concludes, Yee believes the league will be forced to penalize lightly, simply from the details of their own indecisive report.

The king of the sports interview, Dan Patrick, allowed former ESPN anchor Bill Simmons to talk himself towards employment death (Simmons was released a day after a Brady related rant, a rant that Patrick skillfully enticed on his show), while attempting to defend Brady and the Pats from the stupidity of the subject and of many people (that Simmons specifically named) including the NFL officials handling this mess. Today, Patrick used the same smooth skill to force Brady's agent into sounding more guilty than the guy he was supposed to be representing.

Prefacing the introduction of Brady's agent, Patrick disarmed Yee by declaring that he too, the great Dan Patrick, thought the whole deal was silly. And then he let Yee sink his client into a corner that he most likely won't fully recover from.  Patrick does his homework and clearly has an arsenal of questions that he will use as necessary in order to dominate the interview battle.  If you are disarmed by anything he says, he is positioned to keep you there for as long as your conversational capacity leaves you weaponless.

Patrick started the cornering with a simple question.

Is this a witch hunt?

Before today (or Pre-Patrick if you will),Yee's statements seemed to suggest that Tom Brady, the face of the entire NFL, is a guy the the NFL wants to besmirch. Again, Patrick does his homework, so by the time of the Yee interview, Yee seemed much less eager to step his foot into the hole he sort of created with the suggestion that outside forces, witches if you will, are conspiring to bring down Brady.  According to the report, a team did blow the whistle on Brady and Belichick who were accused of having deflated balls against the New York Jets, cluing the league to check for similar behavior in the AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts.  Instead of standing by a full denial of his clients participation, Yee focused on the fact that the Patriots and Brady never got the clue that the league was watching them like they gave Sean Payton and the New Orleans Saints before suspending people for the Bounty-Gate issue.  Is it a coincidence that the Patriots have the least amount of turnovers in the NFL, and does that point to a concern reaching wider than just the guy who takes snaps at center? Did the Patriot history of rule bending cause the league to remain undercover in their investigation or has the NFL always tried to sweep the Patriots mess under the carpet?

Should the league have warned Brady to "cut it out" like they did three times for the Saints before causing them worldwide embarrassment? During a scheduled event in which Jim Gray was assigned to lob the softball questions at the Superbowl MVP, Brady was reticent to talk much himself because he had not completed "the process he was going through", as he stated to Gray. When Patrick asked Yee for a clarification of the "process" that Brady's undergoing before he comes out with a statement, Yee eluded to the NFL review process and not some mental balancing process that Brady sort of seemed to suggest.

Patrick is constantly pursuing his moment and saw a chance to snatch Yee's tiny .22 caliber pistol out of his shaky hand by asking him directly,

"Did Tom take part in this"?

Yee was quick and did not equivocate in his answer.

NO!

If the process of report review and punishment decision is still in motion, No is a good answer, but its not the best answer of those available.  Yes is a pretty good answer in that the face of the league who admits to impropriety would probably be able to quickly resurrect his place on NFL's mount Rushmore, despite the squishy balls that keep forcing his image flat before our eyes.  Without access to Brady's telephone records, the Wells report could not stick him with anything stronger than a strong likelihood of involvement, so Brady could have chosen to take indirect blame by making a claim that equipment managers were independently acting upon a known preference. In other words, he did not need to reassert his preference before the AFC Championship game and was indirectly not involved. In this way, he could try to massage his agent's original answer into this area of caveat- but "Yes I did it" is quickly leaving the table, along with the forgiveness that comes with quickly laying down on the knife. The longer you wait, the bigger the knife gets.


Patrick wouldn't let Yee off the hook so easily with his answer of "No".  Abject refusal of guilt is the kind of stuff that defamation law suits come from, so Patrick turned the corner that Yee least expected- into the alley where he finally took his weapon right out of his hand.

"Since this could stay with Tom his whole life, will you sue for defamation?", asked Patrick. Yee hadn't planned for the turn because he didn't really think anyone believed in his witch hunt theory as anything more than an agent's ploy to minimize damage.  When the question smacked him, Yee needed a moment to gather himself, so he reached for a Twix  candy bar by using the age old "can you repeat the question" question just to buy some time.  Patrick repeated and clarified the question, but suddenly, Yee was no longer willing to work in hypothetical situations.  Without a gun in hand, Yee shot back with the first thing that came to mind, forgetting about the 24 hours he'd just spent operating in that  hypothetical theory about some kind of Brady witch hunt.

Patrick must have anticipated tripping up his interviewee with certain questions, so he equipped himself with the weight to keep him down if he fell.  When Yee thought he'd gotten up from the defamation question, Patrick pushed him back to the ground by asking,

"Why didn't he (Brady) surrender his phone?" The league had access to the phone's of the equipment guys since they belonged to the team, but Brady is getting presidential with his best Hillary impersonation involving personal records. When it came to the phone question,Yee reached for a shield of cover by saying "I don't want to get into all of that and gobble up all of this air time", yet 7 mins later he was still on air with Patrick trying to clean up his clients mess and the extra spills he had added himself.

In the twisted fate of Gate lore, Brady's Washington style dishonest behavior is likely what kept him from attending the presidential presentation that is customary for those who win championship titles.  Rumor blames Brady's absence on conservative politics, but it seems rather peculiar that the player who is the face of the league would be allowed to let politics to get in the way of an awesome PR moment for the team, the league and Brady himself. Is that the Superbowl picture that you just don't put in the den or refuse to explain your absence to the kids as they grow up?

Did Obama find out  about the ultra conservative Brady when the rest of the family showed up for dinner without cousin Tom in tow?  Did Obama roast the Patrriots during the presentation with the potential that they would be innocent or was he told that Brady had a pending punishment?  While most people seem to think that the NFL draft had something to do with delaying  the release of the 5 million dollar investigation, I am of the assumption that the league was trying to use the White House visit and $25,000 as their penalty to Brady for getting busted while cheating and then lying about it.

Patrick got Yee to declare that his client won't admit to obvious guilt and might fade into the sunset with the stain of cheating and lying on his resume.  Will it be an asterisk?  As much as cheating and lying can ever be legacy stains when the subject is football .psi. Cheating comes in many forms in fashions in the NFL, and even this rule has the potential to be conformed to fit Brady's fancy.


Will Brady do time from the phone messages of 2 angry employee's.
On the other hand, the cheating legacy of Brady will soon be synonymous with the organization that made him famous while tip toeing around the edges of rules the entirety of his tenure with the team.  This season, the league will fix the mess that New England created with their bending of substitution rules last playoff season, although the Pats were actually inside of the rules, just so close to the line that the NFL had to erase it  and redraw it far away from the temptation of rule bending players and coaches like the Patriots. In reality, Brady's asshole legacy is really the only thing that was solidified by the Wells report, which mostly aired the beefs of a couple of angry equipment guys.

Is Tom Killing His Own Legacy?

Tom's seems unwilling to accept that angry coworkers who get mistreated so readily are unlikely to be advocates when you get caught up in a scandal directly connected to your mistreatment of them. Yet, these stupid coworkers- whose names Tom couldn't remember during the Super Bowl song and dance over deflategate- are far from a significant part of this story.

Will more people find a reason to hate a proud
 cheater than already hated the proud winner?
The real story is how and why would it take 5 million dollars and so many months to uncover a story when the main culprits were angry coworkers willing to talk?  The pattern of botched investigations- of sorts- has started to make a really wealthy and classy league look like a really calculated manipulator, much like Bill Simmons tried to levy at the NFL when it cost him his 5 million dollar job with ESPN.  Maybe they needed to employ their really expensive investigators to get these equipment guys to give up their company issued telephones, or maybe the NFL is just as loose with rules and rule enforcement as is their poster boy quarterback and their banner team that he plays for?

I didn't expect much of anything to come of this report because the rules against football .psi are limited even for admitted malfeasance.  In Brady's situation, 5 million dollars couldn't corner him into clear guilt, although his loose lipped agent will force the entire Brady camp to stand on their statement that
they did not participate in this act.

These words will change into something that we can actually forgive Brady for, or they will be the proud last words of a foolish man who can't recognize when its time to give up the fight.  Sort of like the way he plays football, except this ain't about football and it ain't impressive like he usually is on the field. So far, this is  one of those rare, poor Brady performance.


Sunday, May 3, 2015

Is Floyd Mayweather Winning Or Desperately Afraid To Lose?


You've heard most of it before.  Some of it I even said myself, so I will paraphrase real quick.

Floyd needs to lose to win and he's way too cocky for most people to root for, even if most of us expected him to win this fight.  Die hard fight fans were simply rooting for boxing, which calls for more mega fights at the MGM Grand.  In other words, Pacquaio needed to win or cut Floyd up a bit for the hopes of a rematch that matters to the viewing public.  A more controversial decision by Floyd could have achieved similar results, but the point of controversy and curiosity and anticipation is not Floyd's 48 or 49 wins- it's his zero.

Zero doesn't comport well in a world that understands personal failure all too well.  Who gets to finish a career unblemished?  Reasonable odds dictate that every man has a cross to bear, and Floyd's cross seems to be crafted out of styrofoam.

At this stage in his storied career, Floyd is even way too skilled with interviews to be sullied by the kind of out of the ring behavior that sidelined several NFL players last season.  When confronted by a reporter who attempted to embarrass Floyd with this NFL analogy and his spotty legal history towards women, he absorbed the jab, side-stepped the hard shot and delivered a calculated counter of 'only God being our judge'- striking the reporter in his tracks.  Floyd is not new to the game, he's true to the game and can bring it outside of the ring with the exact same flare that he uses to dominate inside of it.  He even found a way to repair his feud with Fifty (Cents, the rapper), and, prior to the fight, had him appear on ESPN's First Take to speak on behalf of TMT (TheMoneyTeam), Floyd's money making engine.

As it relates to his money, Floyd "Money" Mayweather is breaking the rules of engagement there too, and getting away with it over and over again.  He has already been a part of the top selling fighting events in the history of boxing, and will likely eclipse previous records since he (yes, Floyd or TMT has dictated the pay per view pricing) and cable were charging $99 for cable viewing- nearly double the price of previous events.  From a marketing perspective, the $99 visual keeps him from being the first boxing pay per view in history to eclipse $100 as well.

He'll save that for the rematch- the swan song he swears will happen in September, which is also when his contract with Showtime ends.

Money Mayweather is solid gold, but his greenish hue might very well be envy since all of his legendary efforts have only made him into the most controversial legend of all time, not the greatest of all time.  That distinction still remains Ali's and Ali's alone- which he apparently tweeted to Floyd just to remind him before he beat Pacquaio and got things confused.

In his response to the Ali tweet, Floyd should have agreed with Ali's claim, but he seemed more inclined to be politically correct but overly proud Floyd instead of humble yourself in the face of true greatness Floyd.  To Floyd's credit, he probably only has the Will Smith movie like most young folks have, as his best memory of the legend we call Ali.  Floyd could have pulled up some old Ali films on NetFlix during an extended hotel stay or two, however, viewing Ali fights only tells part of the story. The legend of Ali is connected to his failures and trials as much as  it is about his triumph in the ring.

Ali was the great over-comer who was unafraid of any challenge, especially the kind he should have feared the most.  He overcame impossible odds to be such a young champion and even stronger odds when he had to revive a career lost to a social movement.  Ali embodies that movement and the capacity to overcome the greatest of odds.

Floyd represents wealth and a defense of his wealth- in and out of the ring. He is an intelligent fighter who recognizes how to score points without giving them up to his opponent. He's hand picked his opponents throughout his career limiting the risk to his record and his money.  Today he fight's the guy that the public chose for him although it appears he chose to put it off until the waning days of both of their careers.  What is normally a loud and boisterous pre-fight Floyd gave way to the serene focused Floyd who seemed to realize his opportunity to redefine his own image against a dangerous opponent is a double edged sword.

The irony of it all is that losing might have been the most profitable way for Floyd to overcome the mega-millions he made last night.  Once again, the only fight that would be bigger than the fight most of us witnessed versus Pacquaio is the rematch from a Floyd defeat. Winning while running and countering- didn't convince anyone, especially Ali, of his worthiness as an all-time great.  Failure seems difficult to deal with, but it is a defining aspect of who most of us are.  From a purely public persona, Floyd is an unblemished champion that will likely retire with an unblemished record- and that might be his biggest blemish.

Floyd Bores Me

The sport is called boxing not fighting.  Sometimes boxer's get pulled into fist fights, but that is never the plan.  Unless you are Manny Pacquaio.  Pac man came for a fight and clearly won the moments when a real fight broke out.  Unfortunately, he could not force the boxer to fight as much as the boxer forced him into a boxing match.  When it comes to the art of boxing (delivering and avoiding punches), Floyd is absolutely the greatest of all time.

From a purely boxing perspective, its really not even close.  Floyd is the master of the sweet science and the undisputed greatest boxer who ever did it.  We, who pay good money to people like Money, call it the 'fight game' because fighting is exactly what we pay our money to see. Who could Mayweather use next to convince us to pay another hundred bucks to see him not really fight with?  We could be convinced to pay for his final fight on earth, but he has to promise to keep that boxing crap to a minimum. When Floyd tried his best against Pac-man to be the fighter that he knows we want him to be, it didn't work and he had to revert.

We might watch the rematch but there needs to be conditions placed on the next fight. Only if he stands and fights and takes out Pacquaio from the center of the ring will Floyd run the risk of getting his face and his record blemished.  The risk could have its own reward, yet that is a calculation that Money must make for himself.  I was hesitant to risk a penny of my money on another Money fight and its not because Showtime will give it away a week later, it's because Floyd doesn't throw enough punches to be the best fighter of all time because he too busy being the best boxer I have ever seen. As a result, when it comes to Floyd, there are really only two things that interest me as a genuine fight fan. Floyd's first real challenge, which  I don't need to pay to see since it will be worldwide news the moment it happens- and the rematch that finally gives him a chance to prove himself as the all-time great he deserves to be seen as.

All of that could have happened in the course of this fight if Floyd was forced to get up from the canvas or climb back late while taking a beating early. He won't clear up his domestic violence stain since the NFL has turned domestic's into public discourse, but he could have dropped the soft champion label by being on the other side of a beating this time. Another smooth song and dance to avoid blemishes and maintain zero didn't cut it for a public fully skeptical about the best boxer who doesn't really want a fight.

Fortunately for Floyd, Pacquaio wanted a fight, but not at the risk of sleeping the way he did when taking a costly risk against Juan Manuel Marquez.  The combination of his lack of normal Pac-man risk taking and Floyd's regular defensive style nearly caused me to take a nap during those last 4 rounds. Pacquaio claimed to have been injured from his training which could explain his lack of risk taking, and justify snooze session #2 if he can use the injury as a viable reason for a rematch.

Floyd doesn't owe it to anyone to take a beating just to prove that he can.  That distinction belongs to a lot of other slurred speech boxers still fighting to be considered the GOAT (greatest of all time).  Many legendary fighters are closer to consideration as the greatest of all time, yet their loss of memory and money challenges the value of being in the running for a crown that will be placed on a scrambled brain. Mayweather is the richest athlete alive and will retain the mental capacity to expand and enjoy his wealth after the boxing days are over.  The next great fighter who we consider the greatest had better finish his career battered and bruised in the brain since we've determined that Floyd's lucidity is also his greatest failure in the ring.

If winning means you have to lose a round, or a tooth or your brain power later in life then I would do it like Floyd has done it too.  In America's past, really poor people who had everything to gain and nothing to lose, risked it all for a chance at boxing greatness.  Floyd started out too damn rich for that nonsense and may be too rich now to even enjoy fighting as a means of making money anymore.  Right now, Floyd basically fight's for the money and his legacy.  The new money becomes indistinguishable in the rising heap that he keeps adding too, and the legacy is tainted by a generation that just doesn't respect boxers over fighters.

Can Floyd actually take a legitimate punch?  Will he ever try? When he finally gets hit with a flurry of punches, will he respond with his own flurry or run like he usually does?  Is there anyone left to fight that will help him tie the undefeated record of Rocky Marciano (49-0).  Floyd didn't come into boxing to break the record and claims he won't stay just to break it. If he does bow out without breaking the record he will probably be the first boxer EVER to quit on time.

Money Mayweather is a winner who did it his way. He calls himself TBE (the best ever) since public ridicule has made him repulsed by the goat thing. Yet, even I'm not ready to label this boxer the best fighter that I have ever seen, although he is as good as any boxer who ever did it.  Purely from a boxing perspective and a historical perspective, his argument has some serious merit.

No one has ever been tagged as the best while they were still doing it anyway.  Even Ali had his detractors.  They lessened in the years since his retirement, but mostly the opposition loses its voice after the career ends and the achievement solidifies into a solid structure like a shoe that only one person's foot will fit. Floyd has solidly placed his foot into the BOOT (best of our time) and the fit is perfect.

As for his place in history? That is for the future historians to determine.