Showing posts with label #Cuba normalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Cuba normalization. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Does Capitalism Force Americans To Sell Democracy(Too), But Stand For Oligarchy?

It's not just Bernie Sanders trying to warn us all that we are being ruled by the oligarchs. Even the oligarchs agree.  Let that really smart billionaire Donald Trump tell you his real idea for immigration and he'll describe some crazy plan to gobble up 11 million people, send them back to Mexico (or wherever they came from), and then find a way to expedite their return because president Trump will be creating a whole lot of jobs that those 11 millions Mexicans will be needed for. This won't endear him to his conservative colleagues during the upcoming debate but he'll be the man in the big chair, not them.
Teflon Don-ald

BTW Trump is not very conservative!


Trump has defied all political punditry and risen regardless of his so-called gaffs. The more substantive gaffs are soon to come. For example, Trump keeps warning us that republicans won't like the fact that Donald Trump believes in helping people that are poor in more ways than GOP tough love.  This probably means he'll be repealing ObamaCare  and reinstating it under  TrumpCare if you press him on the question.  Soon he'll be pressed on a whole lot of questions which could be the moment in which potential republican supporters determine that "The Donald" does not actually lean to the right at all and was a registered independent before trying to assert his voice within the republican arena back when Fox news first became entertainment thirsty enough to seriously recognize his commentary. Sanders is hardly a democrat either, which makes his running as a democrat as peculiar as Trumps misplaced republican approach to the White House.

The truth is that third party options are still mostly laughable simply because not enough Americans actually vote.  Voting apathy not only allows for voter suppression, it ensures a system that is rigged for the money and the support to be driven behind predetermined talking heads representing an invitation only, party of two where the party plan and the keynote speakers are dictated by Super PAC's, a new methodology of America's oligarchs.  If a PAC don't back you, then you really aren't a candidate at all, which is why Vice president Joe Biden could struggle as a candidate, unless of course president Obama is preparing to publicly back him since the Obama's are a Super PAC, especially Michelle, and their influence could mean that Biden won't need another PAC.

Donald's early threat to be a third party alternative made me think he didn't get into this thing to actually be the president of America since third party candidates can't win yet. Now, even Trump is trumpeting this refrain by telling republicans recently that their best chance is with him as a republican.  The best chance for The Donald to actually win the presidency is as a republican, but does that also mean that the best chance for the republicans is The Donald?  General election polling says no way, and soon both Trump and Sanders will have to determine if their displaced, long-shot campaigns have the legs for the long hall. Bernie's populism message and Trump's fear mongering will have a voice in this race, though each of them are long odds to carry it beyond the primary season.  That duty will likely be left for the more electable candidates to accomplish

It's Not Too Late For A Cross Party Debate.

Sanders and Trump could collaborate on a debate and force a conversation that Fox News, or whichever network that has the next debate, can't control.  Bernie needs to elevate his populist ideology by arguing it against a contrasting conservative anyway, which no longer applies to Bill and Hillary's rhetoric. Trump, on the other hand, needs to remain entertainingly toxic without trying to prescribe policy points from off the cuff, like deporting all of the Mexicans and then expediting their return somehow; probably after he assigns them a president Trump card (I couldn't resist).  A cross party debate would be just the thing for both candidates to break away from the oligarch's (PAC's and network television) control over the political process.

Since Trump is soon to be uncovered as the real RINO (republican in name only), more right leaning republicans who aren't happy with fighting for a chance just to flank the poll leading Trump on the Fox debate stage, will soon be chomping at the bit to bite at Donald.  Trump won't take kindly to being bitten and the whole scene promises to be something that I will eagerly watch, but only so that I can say that I witnessed one of the lowest representations of America's democracy during my lifetime. Hopefully this is our lowest point.
Is any American politician free from the negative impression
that most Americans have of the process? Do WE believe in
any politician or are they all just who WE get to choose from? 

Unlike dirty laundry, ours is the democracy that we boldly reveal before the world and then hold it against Cuba for not following in our footsteps.  A democracy that sends open letters to the Ayatollah of Iran in the middle of nuclear negotiations. A democracy that allows an extremist video to ignite yet another attack against Roe .v. Wade, but also blocks all productive legislation in Congress in the fear of giving the sitting president too many legacy points.  A democracy that reaches out to deal with the challenge of a middle eastern nuclear arms race and Cuban normalcy with a political war at home that promises a swift end to diplomacy in both Iran and Cuba if the wrong party wins that war.

Can You Call Yourself A Democracy Officially With only 36.4% Voter Participation?

This is a democracy that doesn't really vote in mass because voting, as it stands, doesn't help to avoid "do nothing" elected officials.  In our democracy, WE still have 600,000 citizens of Washington D.C., the nations capital no less, who pay taxes but live without real representation because they can't vote and neither can their lone representative in congress who has limited voting powers. Instead of national ballot initiatives that give every American the right, privilege and duty (maybe legal if necessary) of a real democracy and not a broken representative one, our democracy insures that gerrymandering and guns remain a right while education and voting are privileges with embedded hurdles that really old people and ex-cons are finding harder and harder to surmount.

Our democracy sucks you up and spits you into a category of its choosing.  You can fight and claw your way out of economic slotting, but you had better dig in deep to pull yourself  to the top of the the social casting system which demands Oprah like wealth or Rush Limbaugh/Bill O'Reilly influence to counterbalance the weight of casting.  Regular Joe's (or Barack's) often make their social climb using political power plays, but find themselves handcuffed by the oligarchs or caving to lobbyists who are enlisted by the oligarchs. These are aspects of our version of democracy, but for some reason WE often hope no one mentions those ugly parts while insisting that others be more like US for the sake of business considerations.

Reports Say Castro's Struggling To Swiftly Embrace Change

If Cuba is resisting normalized relations and hesitant to implement change, it might be the kind of democracy that has Donald Trump on every news channel that's driving their fear.    If you remain on the channel past the five minutes of  Trump, and take a deep dive into poll numbers of our current president and every candidate for our next president, it becomes clear that even WE don't really care for any of these candidates even though we know one of them has to be the next lead representative of American democracy.  What Cuba and all nations adverse to U.S. democracy must realize is that capitalism is bigger than all of us. Americans- even Donald Trump- do business in China because we have to not because we really want to.  China and countries worse than China have done business in Cuba throughout our 50 years of Cuban sanctions and will continue to make their way to Cuba to do business in the event that hard line republicans in congress force the U.S. to remain not as welcomed in Cuba simply from continued toxic rhetoric.  Can you imagine what happens if Marco Rubio somehow actually wins the presidency?

 No, rambunctious Rubio and tenacious Trump are not the only reason that Cuba and many people around the world examine the American pride in for our version of democracy and snicker just a bit.  On balance, this great nation has accomplished too much to deserve such an indictment against our politicians or our version of democracy. But WE can't keep ignoring the sound of laughter.  Can WE?

Friday, December 19, 2014

Cuba Searching For Greener Grass. For America Its Just Business

The problem with living in the shadows is having a view of the sun.

The problem with living in the sun is skin cancer.
Fidel Castro in front of a Havana statue of Cuban
 national hero 
José Martí in 2003. (wikipedia)

The decision to place trade embargo's against the nation of Cuba was made over a half century ago and it was made in support of the people of Cuba who asked the nation of free flowing sunshine to force the shadowy Castro regime out of power.  In essence, their belief was that squeezing the life out of Cuba would harm so many people that Fidel Castro (and now Raul, his brother) would be compelled by love of country to do the right thing.

It didn't work.

Not only has the embargo not worked, it has only hurt the people it was intended to liberate. If the embargo was intended to expand the entrepreneurial spirit of the people of Cuba who have taken their desolate situation and turned it into an opportunity to display the vibrant shine of Cuba and its people, then it did work. Cubans have survived the "mutually belligerent" policies (as Alan Gross called it) of Cuba and America, and America should not only embrace the vast entrepreneurial wave within Cuba, we should invest in it because Cubans and Americans have never been at odds even if our mutually belligerent policies are.

In fact, every nation in the world, except the US, does business in Cuba, and even WE fly directly their from Florida to accommodate particular interests that congress had to deem "acceptable", since congress is the only institution in America with the power to lift the embargo.  What congress does not have the power to do is stop the conversation that has started towards normalization.  Cubanos throughout the nation of Cuba stand resolute in their belief that it is time to normalize relations, so the primary reason that we continue to take our stand against the shadow is because we have determined ourselves to be the sun.

The greatest impact of the embargo has been all of the Cuban dissidents/exiles and their children that enriched our nation and our brain chest of ideas.  Marco Rubio stands as a significant example, but he grew up believing that Castro deserves punishment for what he caused to happen to families like the Rubio's.  For the Castro regime to receive three of theirs in exchange for one of ours represents having accomplished "everything he was asking for" according to Rubio.

While it is questionable if these three comprades are everything the Castro's wanted from America, it is not questionable that the embargo that they would prefer to address is still fully within the control of Rubio and his cohorts in congress.  In addition, this embargo reflected the will of a people that have changed their minds.  Those who chose to relinquish their Cuban citizenship in protest of Castro also relinquished their voice in the decisions of future inhabitants.  The future is now and the voices are calling for a change.  If Rubio would rather listen to Cuban-American opinion over Cuban-Cuban decisions, than he is showing an allegiance to exiled families, to the past and to his understanding of an issue that has changed since his father and countless others got away from it all.

The Cold War civilization of 1959 has evolved into Americans who somewhat correctly call their own president a communist, and China being the nation we borrow from the most. Lines between capitalism (called democracy) and socialism (called evil) is one more big American welfare program or Hong Kong student protest away from blurring completely across the globe. Socialism shouldn't even draw such comparisons to capitalism in that one is a system of governance and the other is suppose to be an economic system; however, those who honestly embrace capitalism or desperately temper it with socialism know better.  As Rubio and the anti-Castro regime clamor for a more democratic Cuba, they also quietly approve back-alley expansions in campaign financing that makes it easier for rich people to dictate democracy in America.

If Cuba is stuck with the Castro's and should be a victim of their governance, it will be for another 30 years or less, America will be dictated by rich men infinitum.


Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Recognizing Game: Obama Builds His Legacy With Cuban Normalization

While pondering the deeper meaning of "legacy", Obama must have realized
 that Cuban relations must be normalized.
BAM!

When you start talking legacy, you can save that crap for George W. Bush.  The Obama legacy began from the day he took over the worst market failure since the Great Depression.  Now he has watched gas drop below $2 and the market reach record numbers, and....

He is normalizing relations with Cuba, and...
He has exposed the truth about Cheney the torturing Dick, and...
He is moving towards resolving the Immigration issue once and for all, and....
He has initiated the international effort to stop ISIS, and....
He did achieve Universal Healthcare, and....
He is going after student loan debt, and...
He assigned his Attorney General to provide chest cams in Ferguson which should save a few young black men  from unnecessary death by cop.  New York is following suit and nationwide black men are safer today than they were yesterday just because of the conversation started under his watch.

He may be the reason we are more polarized as a country, but its likely that he is nothing more than a scab, not the wound.  If Obama is the reason that we have had to take an unwanted stare into a dirty mirror, he will also be the reason why we begin to clean the reflection.

His critics speak colloquially about him, saying he's too ________________ to be a good president or Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, but the record he has compiled belies their commentary and their own final assessment on Benghazi.  Should we work with hostile mid-eastern regimes who will help stop ISIS today but kill Americans tomorrow and still refuse to normalize relations with Cuba?

Its time to stop repeating the failures of history and to learn from them, and it is time to recognize the breadth of the Obama legacy which is being written before our eyes.