The Question Still Remains. WHY DO WE HAVE THIS REPORT?

As the conspiracy theories mount regarding this bizarre series of events, try this one on for size.

This portion of the convenience store theft report (see below) was amended by the officer who took over this case the Monday following the killing of Mike Brown (2 days later).  First question is, why does anyone need to take over the cigarillo case which is listed as a 48.99 loss to the convenience store, but no names of the convenience store workers or notes saying they would pursue this crime. This case should have been shut before it needed to be open, not reassigned so that multiple statements could be entered for a case that died the minute the victim refused to press charges.

The bigger concern is why would the confirmation of the two individuals names be added to an incident that the merchant didn't care to pursue, and since the names were clearly added on Monday by the newly assigned cop on this case, why did this newly assigned cop need to officially name the cigarillo suspects?  The original officer did not include these names.  This eyewitness of Browns dead corpse could have been made by the merchants who are the only people who laid real eyes on the thief.  Apparently, this newly assigned cop has better vision when it comes to turning unknown perpetrators into confirmed dead people by video imaging alone.  As you read this report, it seems as though Johnson is added simply from his televised interviews and not from him admitting to a crime that the video would have cornered him on anyway. Why couldn't they simply force Johnson to admit his involvement in the video taped crime.  BECAUSE THE CASE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CLOSED, since the merchant refused to testify, yet notes are continuously being added.

LINK TO THE FULL REPORT

After all of that minor madness, there still is this question of the statement that you see above and the one contradicting it made by the Ferguson police chief.  This Monday morning addendum says that "It is worth mentioning that this incident is related to another..." The chief of Ferguson now says it was NOT related  because Darren Wilson (the shooter), had no clue about the cigarillo theft. Yes, its worth mentioning this report so long as you release the incident reports that you are referring to.  As of now, they have yet to release the only report/s that matters in the death of Mike Brown and the only report that has been requested. Yet, we have mass proliferation of a strong arm theft report with several addendum notes made for nearly a week, before you give us what actually we asked for?  How many times do you need to reword a totally unrelated petty theft that was exceptionally cleared by a non-pursuant merchant  before it was permanently expunged by the death of the key suspect; which made any additional notes on this theft, especially his name, unnecessary  and impossible to prove anyway

Darren Wilson had no clue Big Mike was stealing, nor did America until the chief insisted we read this report.  However, this report directly mentions the only reports that we've been asking for in the first place. Wilson may not have known about this almost meaningless report before he shot Brown, but he better love it like a Bible right now. This report is possibly the report that keeps Darren Wilson from doing life in prison, because in Missouri, there will be less punishment for killing a strong arming cigarillo thief.

Now.  Can we get those other two reports.....please?