- "Those of us who serve our country are increasingly treated like the suspects we pursue"
--- concerned federal employee with high security clearance.
__________________________________
Big Brother James Clapper (Director of National Intelligence) |
- What today's Big Brother update signifies is that the DNI is more than a seeing eye. The DNI is looking to live up to a mystical reputation by putting the ACE's in a row.
- “What we need is a system of continuous evaluation where when someone is in the system and they’re cleared initially, then we have a way of monitoring their behavior, both their electronic behavior on the job as well as off the job,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Congress last month.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/us-intelligence-officials-monitor-federal-employees-security-clearances/
The NSA meta data collection confirms the concept of Big Brother watching you and I to some degree, but remains overblown for the most part. The reality that Big Brother is doing whatever they deem necessary to federal employee's has moved beyond a popular myth, this is a confirmed agenda. Dividing lines between employment and individual privacy may soon take on a breach that could fracture the spectrum of freedom, especially in the realm of employment.
ACES is not collecting metadata either. ACES is after real data about real people who deserve the right to a level of anonymity outside of work. To subject federal employees to continuous counter espionage treatment sets a precedent that every corporation could someday justify as a reasonable expectation of employment. Clearly in this matter, employment, and not national security, is the reason by which this program is being justified.
In other words, if this program is deemed reasonable, then federal employee's, and anyone too close to them, could be an indirect victim of the continuous evaluation system. Without proper warrant, ACES could tap and track my wife and children because they are connected to my phone account which has triggered the automated system. This is just one of the many scenario's that come to mind.
Traitor: Eric Snowden |
If there ever was a Pandora's box, this might be it. Sacrificing freedom should never be a condition of employment, but ACES makes for the highest stake employment compromise in our history. ACES is more than a slippery slope, it is an overreach that will cause casualties if implemented. When the first casualty of this system arises, I expect the government response to resemble the Stand Your Ground law in which the victims will be silenced for the sake of the system.
Sadly, Eric Snowden has forced the hand of government to put its ACES in a row so that no other internal breach occurs without some evidence of prevention efforts. However, unless ACES eliminates espionage, what is it for? Doesn't every country conduct espionage efforts? Isn't spying and information leaking simply par for the course, and if so, is ACES actually attempting to create a James Bond fail safe?
Admit it. Bond will never be denied and ACES will eventually need to justify itself in the lives of the federal employee's it seeks to continuously evaluate.
This time Big Brother has gone way too far.
No comments:
Post a Comment