Showing posts with label #GOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #GOP. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Trump, Biden Have Similarities. Caged Kids Isn't One

     

                              Be it an immigration update or an economic forecast, the intelligence briefings and reports of the general state of the nation an incoming and outgoing president receives are not different, especially during the period of transition.  The primary difference is what they choose to do with the information. The state of the union is laid to bare during a transition as an incoming president can only dribble balls that are already inflated and bouncing when they arrive. Biden got into the race to become president because he was convinced WE needed dramatically new direction in leadership from the White House, and he could provide it. For the most part, he was right, however, there are ways he isn't different from his predecessor.

                            While I don’t want to upset anyone with unfair comparisons between our new president and the past one, I do think it’s important to note, 5 weeks in, where there are some similarities as well as similarities we've heard about that aren’t necessarily true. First and foremost, thank God Biden doesn't govern by tweet, but that's just scratching the surface.

Is President Biden Caging Kids, Just Like Trump Did?

                              Despite the genuine challenge immigration poses, let’s fully debunk the notion that Joe Biden is separating families in the same manner that Donald Trump was. The distorted hypocrisy of Trumpians lying about Joe Biden doing the very thing they celebrated Donald Trump for is typical, laughable and reminiscent of that insurrection they openly planned, conducted and applauded before they decided it was probably smarter to blame it on ANTIFA.

                             To be clear, if Biden has reopened any of Trump's caged-kid facilities, and he has, it is only to deal with the volume of migrants at the border and to find a way to humanely bring them inside from the elements while keeping them together as a family. Had Trump shown the decency to, at the very least, keep families together, none of the controversy over caged kids would’ve ever began. Of course, now we understand that the cruelty and the transformation of the U.S. image as a global humanitarian was not mismanagement. It was the actual goal. Whether they succeeded or not is a question for time and the history books.

                   Under Biden, Trump or whoever is president, migrant families, walking thousands of miles towards the U.S. border and their hope for freedom, turn themselves over to authority willingly, and have never cared about the nature of the facility they eat sleep and get water from in the initial stages of the asylum process provided they remained with the same children they brought with them during the death defying journey. Because Trump chose the cruel path of separating families in this very moment of their lives, Pres. Biden's administration is currently attempting to reuinte hundreds of missing kids with parents, and has promised to allow those families who were separated, to reunite in the United States as a form of retribution for what they’ve endured.                     
Doesn't Golden Calf Trump have
on the Apollo Creed shorts?

                          No matter what OAN and NewsMax tell you, the immigration policy of these two presidents are not the same at all. What is similar between the current president and the former president involves this farce of a political conference that Trump headlined this past weekend. After days of deifying his name and his memory in preparation for the keynote speech of their golden calf, Trump himself finally spoke to the crowd- who would’ve been just as happy if they had called it TPAC and cut the charade- but only talked about old grievances, never offering any guidance to the party nor a commitment of a future presidential candidacy.

           Straw polling from the event determined Trump the clear-cut winner of the conference, but he only achieved 55% of the vote splitting the other 45% of the vote with a sparse crowd of names, none impressive enough to warrant a mention. Of significant note are the two most likely challengers to the Trumpian wing of the Republican throne, Niki Haley (SC), and former VP Mike Pence (IN), because neither were in attendance.

        How does this anti-climactic loser worshipping conference overlap with Biden? To date, Biden himself has not declared as a 2024 candidate either, seemingly suggesting in the early days of his campaign that he’d be willing and interested in handing the reigns of his presidency over to someone else after one term. 

Is President Biden still serious about one term or was that just a ploy to gain progressives support?

            Biden hasn’t spoken of it again since making his VP selection, and Kamala Harris could be the protégé Biden hopes to groom between now and the 2024 election, however, is she enough to offer U.S.? If the Democrats hope to go into 2024 with a bench to choose from, shouldn't Democrats consider identifying their "who's next" just like Republicans tried to do this weekend? Can the conversation begin in earnest before Biden public says what he plans to do one way or the other? If Kamala Harris is being set up for a Hillary Clinton style coronation as our next president, don't be shocked if the 2024 presidential election results end similarly to 2016 for Democrats as well. Niki Haley would love to be our nations first female president instead of Kamala Harris. Trust me on this!

A LOT OF PEOPLE WANT THE SAME THING TO HAPPEN WITH SCHOOLS!

            This other area of similarity between the current and former president isn’t necessarily an easy pill to swallow given the heated politics related to the subject, however, Biden and Trump wanted the exact same thing to happen with our schools and probably for the same reasons. No, I don’t really think Donald Trump gives a damn about kids or education, but I also don’t believe Joe Biden’s motivation for opening schools is entirely altruistic either.

                I’m not saying Biden doesn’t care about kids and teachers. His wife is a lifelong educator, and her feelings on most subjects influence her husband immensely. What I am saying is, a significant segment of the U.S. economy is tied to the food service programs of public schools and universities across this land. Consequently, losing the regular flow of so much food across this country has been as crippling to our economy as any one thing could be. 

               Without question, there can be no return to normal without returning our schools to normal. Biden knows it, and so did Trump. Without question, the politics on reopening schools even has the teachers union torn between themselves over what is the right thing to do- open the schools or keep remote learning until the virus passes a bit more? And, without question, lots of kids are suffering as a result of this. Yes, some kids more than others, but all are suffering one way or another from schools being anything other than open for business just like they used to be. 

        Yet, without question, Biden is pushing to open the schools nearly as hard as he's pushing the vaccine because the health of the nation is tied to the vaccine just as the health of our overall economy is tied to fully functioning schools and universities serving tons of food each week. 

            
                Love it or hate it- for our current president, Sleepy Joe, or the former president and leader of the insurrection- much of this school opening conversation is strictly about the economy, not the kids
. If that similarity between Biden and Trump is tough to swallow, my apologies, but it is what it is.



 

 

                               


Friday, February 19, 2021

WE're Only Talking About Ted Cruz And Gov. Cuomo Because WE Miss President "What's His Name"

 



https://soundcloud.com/silkeee1/recording-34

Why is this Ted Cruz story even a story?

Before I defend my view on this, I understand that Mr. Cruz has an obligation as a leader of his state to try and do whatever he can to aid those he represents whenever he can. However, what exactly can Ted Cruz do other than pretend to be doing something while freezing his ass off along with everyone else?



Yes, I also understand that Ted Cruz decided to call his decision a mistake before I could finish this article, but do you think he thought it was a mistake when he was calling for security detail to safely guide him and his group to the airport? Of course not! This became a mistake for two reasons. The first and most significant is TMZ and the gotcha' culture it proliferates, and I will leave that at that. 

The second and very significant reason as well, is the absence of #45 to go golfing right now and make Cruz' trip to Cancun seem less of a mistake. On a broader scale, the loss of the president who refuses to concede he lost the presidency has caused another problem that I’ll get into after I finish talking about our trip over Ted Cruz first.

Why Are WE Trippin' On The Ted Cruz Trip?

Let’s assume Ted Cruz decided to jump on the telephones and call citizens around Texas from El Paso, a working electrical zone not connected to the Texas grid problem, just as Beto’ O’Rourke did. Wouldn’t it be necessary for Ted Cruz to NOT ONLY get on the phone and call citizens of Texas like Beto’ O’Rourke did, but he would have to film it, Tweet it, or announce on television news that he’s calling citizens of Texas, just like Beto’ O’Rourke did, in order for any of us to know he did it?

In fact, why do we even know Beto’ O’Rourke called citizens of Texas to check on them? It’s because we found out Ted Cruz took a trip to Cancun and we needed to compare and contrast just to embarrass him! 

Or am I missing something?!

 Every opinion I share is for the sake of debate, which is to say, I recognize there are legitimately differing views on this topic. Therefore, in the spirit of everything debate worthy, I acknowledge my view on this could be clouded by something I'm missing other than a lot of people wanting an A-hole like Cruz to remain frozen just like everyone else while figuring things out, instead of doing the same damn thing from a place a lot warmer. But it also seems, in the absence of our former president, President "what’s his name", we are now stuck looking for new reasons for all the continued day drinking, as well as new reasons to care anymore about what’s on the current news cycle. In our search for reason, stories like this can help a lot.

       Stories Like This?

 I can’t help but wonder what became of the Florida whistleblower story, especially in light of  recent whistleblowing reports against Gov. Cuomo of New York? Maybe the comparison is somewhat unfair because, despite the similar allegations of intimidation connected to both stories, Gov. Cuomo seems to be fully cooperating with the investigation against him. To date, no formal investigation against Florida and its Governor  has been announced in the same fashion of the Cuomo investigation.

Rebekah Jones, the Florida whistleblower, was still being pressured by law enforcement officials many months after being fired from her job and there is no announcement about why they did it nor is their an apparent DOJ investigation into that matter in Florida either. Does anyone believe the Covid-19 numbers in Florida have ever been anywhere close to accurate? Does anyone care that the same story we are chasing in New York has basically died in Florida even though the stories are similar and Covid-19 is still at a peak death rate nationwide?

Yes, the matter in Florida is a bit dated, but it’s not much different from the claims in New York and it surely deserves the same investigation that New York is getting, especially after the raid a few months ago on the home of the whistleblower. In my mind, this  might have become a bigger story if it didn't happen under the previous DOJ. Yet, my mind is also telling me, rather loudly, that some of what WE are witnessing in this moment in time is a news media that thrived on the absurd and the sensational things that oozed from the pores of the past president's administration, and now it has developed an insatiable appetize for the cuisine.

Why Are Media Layoffs Finally Happening Now?

Locally and Nationally, newsrooms are seeing the announcement of the loss of staff every single day. But, why now? Covid-19 is the reason most are giving, but the virus has been around for over a year now and the layoffs for everyone else happened quite some time ago. 

In my mind, the rather obvious truth is, president "what's his name" was just too good for business to trim all the fat he allowed for before the extra staff could finish covering his insurrection as well as that awkward send off he threw for himself before he flew away for the very last time taking his sensationalism and ratings with him.


            I am writing this article that mentions president "what's his name" realizing, more people liked, shared or commented about the stuff I wrote as well for 4 years whenever I mentioned #45. For the sake of my own sense of integrity, I wrote less about president "what's his name" during the past two years because it was clear to me, if no one else, there was a double-edged sword involved with riding the coattail of the devil.

I also believe there was nothing really new to write about "what's his name" other than the one or two sentences of details of the newest moment of shame he was ushering US into while slithering away from it with the help of the GOP. I decided long ago, it's hard to call a clown a clown over and over again without eventually appearing somewhat clown'ish yourself, so I stepped away from the large amounts of face paint I too was wearing. Instead, I chose to post my one or two sentences on #45 in 144 word tweet format for the past two years, just so I could, at the least, vent along with everyone else while maintaining a sense of integrity.

Nonetheless, you can't spend that long away from writing about a person on purpose and suddenly forget such a concerted effort. So, if I must mention him, I have chosen to use his name sparingly or in code, to allow former president "what's his name" room to find whatever dark corner he promised before he promised he would be back in some form or fashion, trusting in his former promise and not his latter.

Before I write too much and have no choice but to mention the orange guy once again, I will close this piece by saying, despite all of the terrible things you said about him and his wife, Ted Cruz misses your ass right now like you wouldn't believe. Governor Cuomo does too, at least a little bit.



 

Sunday, February 7, 2021

GOP Rescue of MTG Will Restore Truth. Here's Why!

                If you caught that half-hearted apology that #MarjorieTaylorGreene (MTG) gave on the House floor, (video above) you might not have realized the significance of the moment, so I thought I would explain it more clearly.

                On the face of it, (R) #KevinMcCarthy (CA), a very weak House minority leader, displayed his characteristic weakness by broadcasting how sincere and apologetic MTG was with him when he and the Republican conference confronted her about all of the stuff she said before she was a member of Congress.

                It’s important we characterize The Spineless One’s misunderstanding of the #MTG transgressions as pre-Congress, something he probably didn't thoroughly research, because McCarthy seemed to not understand that most of what MTG said when confronted with her own pre-Congress words and actions, she held ground or doubled down on days before he finally dealt with it, and a five minute Google search would have provided the pertinent facts to Kev' the Spineless.

(the worse of MTG's pre-Congress comments, below)

                It's actually hard to say if Kev' the Spineless knew or didn't know about #MTG's ardent stance in the days before she relented because there was a moment in which, he with no spine, seemed to try to address it all and quiet the party infighting that was building between the #Trumpian right he's vying to lead,  and the moral majority which included a handful of Republicans who voted in favor of #impeachment. The group of #Republicans who voted to impeach included #LizCheney (WY) who was personally taking friendly fire on her committee seat too for her decision to hold #DonaldJTrump to account for his role in the #insurrection. Spineless Kevin seemed most interested in no one in his party becoming the villains over this, even though McCarthy was more than willing to demonize the House #Democrats for doing the exact same thing #Cheney and the other Republicans did. #Trump most certainly would have made villains out of the 10 Republicans in the #House who voted to impeach him. Kev' the Spineless let them all off the hook.

                Constant retaliation and demeaning labels like Kev' the Spineless abounded under Trump, whereas relenting to the moral majority was unlikely to have happened had #DJT still been the party leader orchestrating the response. The willingness of MTG to hold strong for days when confronted by reporters about her pre-Congress behavior and ongoing post election justification of herself, only to eventually relent, was a misstep and a clear sign of the beginning of the end of an era, the era of unrepentant lying.

                Displaying weakness with a closed door Republican conference and a secret vote over MTG's and Cheney's committee status via a closed door Republican conference, Kev' the Spineless allowed MTG to temporarily keep her committee seats, although, by not removing MTG himself, he forced Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, and the rest of his House colleagues to bring the matter to the floor for debate and a vote. The vote didn’t end well for Greene. In fact, some reports have suggested, if Pelosi had decided to make her floor vote against MTG a secret just as Kev' the Spineless did, even more Republicans would have voted to remove her.

                Either way, it didn't really end well for Republicans, MTG or McCarthy either who was summoned to meet with Trump days before of all of this came to head, probably to tell Kev' the Spineless that he needed to be more relentless and relent less.


Did McCarthy come back with
marching orders after meeting  
with Trump in Mar-A- Lago?
                At least, that's what seems to be the case because, in the aftermath of his Trump meeting, McCarthy came out in public with a piece of paper containing a list of Democrats and a warning (possibly written in sharpie) that, if he (McCarthy) is ever the majority leader, he will go after specific Democrats on committees (Eric Swalwell (CA) and Maxine Waters (CA) were the only names he mentioned) as retaliation for what was done to MTG. While not-so-spineless Kev' had a clear warning for Democrats, it's not apparent what punishment would be doled out to the 11 Republicans who voted along with the Democrats, an element of  his spineless response to all of this,  something Trump would not have overlooked.

                Nonetheless, Trump and all those who still love him probably appreciated the new and improved spine Kev' tried to display after meeting with the GOP's recently deposed party boss.  However, much like the results of Nov. 3rd and the ensuing GOP response that followed, McCarthy's retaliation speech felt like more of the same sour grapes complaining we'd heard following the presidential election loss as well. Whatever you call his attempt to warn and complain, once again, it was too little, too late. (video below)

                When given a final chance to save herself from what was clearly becoming her inevitable fate, MTG blinked. In that brief moment, she appeared sincerely interested in retaining her committee assignments, at least interested enough to try and kiss ass like we had never seen her do before. By relenting, as she was likely advised to do, neither MTG nor the person who advised her to relent had any clue what they were doing to the brand in that moment, and I believe it was bad advice. 

                In one last ditch effort, MTG did her level best to avoid being stuck in Congress for two years with nothing to do except peddle more odd conspiracies and oppose Democrat legislation whenever possible, and it failed. Perhaps the residents of Forsythe County, GA won’t see their rebellious rep as nearly as useful to them anymore and will consider a recall themselves, especially since MTG did not rediscover her own stripes until the morning after her committee assignments were gone?

(video below)

               
                 When relenting didn't stop her removal from her committee assignments, the same person who once refused to relent until she had little choice, decided to go back on television the following morning and tell the world “I feel free [to speak as I want again]". Apparently, it took mirrors that only exist in MTG's house, a good night of sleep and freedom from committee assignment confusion to remind her of who she really was and what she had done to the brand, because, like that ugly person you take home for a one night stand, the morning after was nothing like the night before. 

A snake eating its own tail.
            What MTG is saying in this twice revised walk-of-shame is, the position she claims to feel free from she also was willing to stand naked in apology before the world, and agreed to enslave herself and bridle her slithery tongue if her colleagues in Congress would have only allowed her to stay in her position of power; a position that provided the pressure to deal with her awful behavior in the first place. 

                What MTG also doesn't recognize is, once you denounce your own lies, you no longer have the “freedom” to lie the same again. MTG might think she is more free minus her committee seats, but her tongue has already been clipped by a moment of weakness from herself and Kev' the Spineless, and there simply is no way to repair a clipped tongue or walk again once you've been cursed to crawl.

                For the rest of her days in Congress, everything MTG says will have that familiar hissing sound of self destruction- like a vicious snake that pounces but doesn't even recognize it's eaten its own tail. Right or wrong, that snake we called Trump could drown out all the hissing noise by standing firm behind the lies and the liars and redirecting the blame or chewing on the tails of anyone and everyone but himself. After this recent matter involving MTG, it appears as if Trump's "never relent" posture left the GOP when he did.

                        Why does this matter? If the true facts of the JFK assassination can still be debated, and they are, 911 and Sandy Hook don’t have to be considered real events to everyone either, which is the place we have found ourselves after a four year war against truth. Every war is based upon a series of battles, and truth won its first battle in this war when it removed Trump from office. By voting to remove MTG from her committees, the House of Representatives handed truth another battle victory while simultaneously declaring that certain agreed upon truths must be treated with the level of respect they deserve while you are serving in Congress, assuming you want a committee assignment and plan to stay in D.C. for more than two years.

                Losing access to all committee seats will not be helpful to MTG's reelection efforts, so the likelihood is, this moment of truth is both the beginning and the end of MTG. It's possible she'll run for office again in two years given her bulldog disposition, and it's even possible she could win in her redder than red voting district that must be a bit peculiar place if they voted for her to begin with. It's more likely that her own constituents have seen enough from her and will be ready to move on from the MTG experience and controversy given the lack of committee influence that now comes with the package.

               While the pandemic and the recent election make most of this MTG madness sound like no big deal to a whole lot of people, the universal space in which we could once agree on any basic truth evaporated over the past four years into a matrix of conspiracy theories and lies that used to exist only  in the National Enquirer or The Onion. What we have now, even Snopes couldn't fix. 

                If describing the punishment of one very ardent Trump supporting representative as a victory and restoration moment for truth seems like a big declaration, consider this?

                From this day forward, any Trump-like allegiance to lies can and will burn you in an institution where people are elected to represent true lives and real life situations such as pandemics and the economic recoveries they cause. Mischaracterizations of certain facts is a normal, unfortunate part of politics. Disagreeing about essential truths like birth certificates of an elected president, or death certificates of massacred school children makes the hope of collaborative governance extremely difficult, to say the least.

WE The People, have spent far too long trying to establish a more perfect union based on our divided perceptions of agreed upon truths for us to come to this moment of  allowing ourselves to become lost in a jungle of confusion over clearly proven lies and conspiracies. By way of this punishment of MTG, the House of Representatives at the very least has declared that events like 911 really happened despite all the memes and videos you can find on the internet to the contrary. They also decided threatening fellow members of Congress is not allowed and peddling conspiracy theories will endanger your ability to thrive in Congress even when your own party refuses to hold you to account the way both parties used to do pre-Trump  If you need a point of reference to my last comment, Google the names Steve King or Al Franken).

                WE ejected Trump out of office at the same time that WE elected MTG and a handful of other QAnon friendly types in. While that felt like a bit of a contradiction at the time, in hindsight, the devil we knew seemed much more important than the ones he inspired. Despite the fact that D.C. is now overrun with Trump's little inspirations, genuine demons don’t relent nor do they give a damn about the value of universal truths such as, all of our elections all over the land have, for a very long time now avoided election fraud by employing high integrity election handlers from both sides of the political isle, and those people used to be trusted and respected by ALL of us who cared to vote regularly. 

               Trump set US up for this moment from the moment he first ran for office because he never really thought he would win and instinctively created excuses to deal with any possibility of losing. In reality, the goal of being president was never as valuable to our 45th president as the goal of running. In running for president, Trump could add to the legend and mystery he created around himself. In being president, he could only expose his immense need to golf, his true self-serving nature, and expose himself to way too many institutions designed to ensure America wins no matter who our president is. In the final analysis of what WE've endured, there simply was no way for both Trump and the U.S. to come out victorious in this. One of us or both of us were always destined to lose.

                What Trump had to lose by winning the presidency was the somewhat normal freedom that allows powerful people to do lots of illegal stuff an evade the law, but he also lost the perception of self-made wealth that was shattered by the revelations about his family, mostly from his family. What WE the People had to lose by electing a lying, immoral person was our connection to truth and our universal acceptance of right and wrong. 

                We decided pussy grabbing, caged children, anti-Semitism, homophobia and political retaliation against friend or foe were all okay until the day we said "enough already". Now, with the committee removal of MTG, we've added false conspiracies, threats of harm and other unwarranted colleague confrontations done by any current committee members of Congress to our collective list of "enough already". 

                Of course, this doesn't entirely undo all the damage done to the concept of truth that occurred over the last four years, but it helps.

Monday, August 7, 2017

God, Black People, Democrats Must Fix Their Mess


As a Father and a man of African descent, I have come to accept that some messes in this life fall squarely in my lap.

Within the fictional land that we commonly call the "black community" (blacks don't really like each other enough to be communal anymore), there is a mess of spiritual angst against the tenants of Christianity and the behavior of black church leaders seen as exceedingly money hungry and doctrinally flawed in order to intentionally grab said money while simultaneously subjugating blacks, the original man, to whites, the creator of the plan.

I couldn't properly begin to debate the flaws within the Christian Bible well enough to change anyone's problem with Christianity, especially since human perception is a human reality, and Jesus hates religion too.

Besides, this angst of angry black people, pointing fingers at God and rich church leaders, is as legitimate as the angst of the Atheists, who are mad at the notion of God (the leader of all creation) being a man and/or that She (is it better if She created all of this mess?) would allow for a world of so much disarray. If you acknowledge these indictments with your defenses down, you see that angry black believers and Atheists actually have a  reasonable ax to grind. 
Who else to blame but the creator of all things for the existence of all things, including Satan?

While you are debating in your mind whether that comment constitutes blasphemy, I'll double down by conceding the accusation against money grabbing pastors, who clearly exist, even if to the chagrin of the noble pastors. Tough questions of every sort exist for reasons worthy of discussion, and when you aggressively embrace these hard questions, the questions themselves can give birth to the answers.

So, I'll ask again.

If God created everything, isn't She responsible for everything including war and the failure of trickle down economics caused by the unquenchable greed of man? And when does man assume responsibility in this mess? Somewhere in Africa at the beginning of creation or do man's problems begin when white people come to exist?

As a proud God lover and defender of Christ, I humbly concede on the blame pointed at God, as long as my black friends and family are willing to acknowledge blacks as the original man, and also the origin of every subsequent race of man that followed. Assuming ALL races descended from one race, who else can we blame for the division that produced race, religion, and politics if not the original man?

Who Is To Blame When NO ONE Is To Blame?
Will the NFLPA wield leverage to win  guaranteed
money while so many NFL fans stand ready to
boycott over Colin Kaepernick and concussions?

These inflammatory questions are questions with no definitive answers, but I offer them as poignant examples of the roots of the division and the remedy.

As WE struggle to attain agreement politically, our strained personal economies are the only problem we agree about, because economically we all feel basically the same as we've felt for years despite a booming stock market and our government insisting that things are better. Even with better budgeting, WE the People are still being slowly price gouged by inflated housing prices, at the gas pump, or wherever they can get US.

WE have allowed ourselves to be placed on a treadmill to nowhere, chasing a seemingly unreachable dream simply because WE've abandoned one another along with the formula for economic advancement. When our voices spoke loudest, they were collected and poised to bargain, not to beg for rights or wages.


Over the span of an industrialized half century or so, corporations, unwilling to operate in good faith, have tanked our economy more than once while waging their war against the collective body of collective bargaining. The disintegration of the livable wage America once knew is directly connected to the deliberate destruction of unions and of collective bargaining.

Whether you consider the benefits of paying union dues worthwhile, or you consider paying dues to be socialism, the political right has succeeded in pegging nearly every collective human action as the exact same thing as socialism, something mostly viewed as bad in the eyes of the unlearned.

Instead of potentially winning the presidency as a Socialist, even Bernie Sanders fearfully ran from the tainted label and lost while being undermined by a political party he didn't belong to.

The truth is, we'll never really know if America was ready for a Socialist president, nor do we know what exactly Socialist policy looks like even when it's staring us in the face. Whether collective bargaining qualifies as true Socialism is inconsequential so long as the ideology remains demonized and tagged to anything that involves collective agreement among the masses. Haters of capitalism have besmirched its image fairly well too, even though both economic philosophies remain fully co-dependent on one another.

As Democrats take a short vacation from the Donald Trump debacle, they are finally realizing that they represent the haters of capitalism, and it's an image they must shake if they hope to win the White House or a majority in Congress instead of hoping like Hillary that America is too smart to elect deplorable dummies again.

In the annals of gerrymandering, the Democrats are just not in a winning position to overtake Congress. Their popular vote advantage will never matter much so long as poor people pile on top of each other within big cities while begging suburban big wigs for $15 per hour and better ObamaCare. They must improve their economic message and it needs to make sense, even to the average Joe.

I'm not personally in favor of negotiating for fair wages through D.C. mandated minimums, or for waging the wage war through Washington against the same companies that must thrive for the collective to realize their wage demands.  The reality of our wage future is that some companies can afford $15, or more......and some can not.

That is why collective bargaining matters. It forces the books open and finds a wage that is fair, not just wanted. Collective bargaining doesn't beg, nor does it function like two parents divided over proper parenting, allowing their toddler to assume full control in the vacuum created by their division. Collective bargaining and the resurgence of unions is a time tested, reawakened answer to America's wage issue. Most importantly, collective bargaining is not some pointless platitude that progressive voters will tune out. It is also far from fingers pointed in the wrong direction.

While Republicans have never embraced unions, Democrats have almost abandoned them and are not currently promoting any viable plan for our economy that distinguishes them from the Russian-loving Donald or the GOP. Despite the "more of the same" stuff Senator Chuck Schumer is backing as an economic plan, America mostly views mandated handouts (Medicaid, welfare, once a year tax credits) as progressive band-aids on a knife wound that will never stop the bleeding or address the increased cost of healthcare and education worsened by stagnant wage growth.

Happy days for wealthy folks, however, is not really a positive economic indicator or even a point they need to keep mentioning so long as wages remain unchanged. But that doesn't let Democrats off the hook in the least, even though they keep thinking it does. Although no one believes in the trickle-down theory anymore, they also don't expect incremental government handouts from Democrats to close the earnings gap either.

Within any organized community, the challenges you face are the ones you created for yourself via proactive or reactive choices. Hatred, division, and Donald Trump are alive and kicking, in part, because the party for the common man has been way too busy pointing fingers towards who they think is responsible instead of directing the fingers and responsibility towards themselves.

WE- the believers in the power of collective agreement- are responsible for embracing the power of our unified will, or accepting the results of the division WE've allowed. 

God and black people bear a similar responsibility.


Saturday, February 20, 2016

Progressivism's Problematic Path To The Presidency

Am I the only person who got caught off guard with today's primaries? When did Super Tuesday turn into saucy Saturday in primary politics?  Who expected to be talking politics this weekend, and who knew that it would be so significant to the future of the race?

The world of progressive politics has become so pervasive, that the GOP candidates have to spend as much time as they can bashing Obama just to keep from sounding just like Hillary and Bernie all of the time, while Hillary has resorted to GOP tactics just to deal with the pain of the Bern.

Sure, that joke about all the free stuff the Socialist Sanders will give away when he's president sounds like a funny line for sake of a chuckle, but it doesn't really offer alternatives to the current scenario in which incomes have plummeted and only forced hands will loosen enough to change that fact.  What force ends up looking like in the end is a matter of significant debate among both sides of establishment resistance.

Has GOP voters given in to the Trump craze
even though the GOP establishment has not?
What is not debated is the necessity of more income for average Americans.  Trump might be winning over massive support being the former Democrat that is willing to talk like a tough republican for the sake of a GOP win, but if you ask him what motivates him, he says he loves his work, meaning the deal making and the showmanship, not the politics.  When pressed, he still refuses to own that politician label while continuing to beg us all for a political vote of confidence.

Polls, and tonight's primary results (SC) strongly tilt toward Trump- until you place him head to head with either of the remaining candidates from the opposing side.  In that polling, Trump gets trolloped.  Yet, the tendency for either potential trolloper to prematurely lick their chops needs to be curtailed until they finish their own infighting.

In recent days, Bernie Sanders has correctly accused Clinton and her husband of damaging the black community as it relates to excessive incarcerations and those restrictive welfare policies (welfare to work) and programs that forced single black moms out of the house leaving black children without supervision.  The impact on many poor black single parent households was young men and women captured by the influence of gangs or drugs while  hard working black mothers struggled to keep food stamp support (which now requires both a job and poverty to maintain) to feed her remaining latchkey children that gangs haven't yet taken.

Like Jeb Bush and 9-11, can Hillary
embrace Bill's good without touching the bad?
If Bill and Hillary can admit that the policies were wrong, then they must admit that it was the impact their policies had on real lives that made them wrong, regardless of their good intentions or other good things they've accomplished for poor people in general.

Conversely, Senator Sanders has been accused of offering way too much in the way of free public services without a realistic vision of how to get it passed through congress or paid through fiscal provisions.  This is also an accurate claim against Sanders and his ideas, though ObamaCare, Social Security, the military, public schools or any needed socialized program demands proper funding adjustments to realize optimal efficiency, a word that is typically not associated with our government.

Hence the problem.

That same inefficient government likely holds the last best hope for price controls within our healthcare industry, controls that exist in nearly every country expect America. Current growth trends relative to medical costs show healthcare increasing at a much lower rate than it did prior to ObamaCare's beginning, but insurance companies are fighting to keep you from finding out.  For Sanders to speak to the necessity of changes in areas like medical costs or college debt strapping our children, doesn't immediately make him responsible for the details that would go with implementation of these obvious needs.

Hillary tried her hand at healthcare before Obama got it done and knows that details always need to be ironed out. Bernie also understands that the Clinton's expected their policies to ruin black families about as much as Bush expected to ignite ISIS with his invasion of Iraq.  For now, what they both know of each other and what they are saying lately have grown worlds apart.

For now, the gloves are not totally off, but Hillary and Bernie have switched to those smaller MMA version of gloves so that the sting is felt a little more.  Clinton has recognized the threat of Sanders despite his Democratic Socialist label, and Sanders has discovered a real viability for his message in spite of his Democratic Socialist label.

What shall proceed is not helpful to either candidate or to this coronation for progressivism.   Clinton is not going to be better off for having to explain how Bill screwed up black people or for having to articulate an impossible agenda for dealing with it when black people who support Sanders inevitably pose the question to her.  Sanders, on the other hand, is also not better served for having to do the very thing that Donald Trump scoffs at- share policy details.

If Sanders has to explain the single payer system too much, it won't get him elected and we will be stuck with huge deductibles, since huge deductibles are the last best place for the medical insurance industry to stick it to us and cover their shareholder commitments. Medical industry profits aren't as huge as most people think, and are mostly derived from the assured  long term presence of sick people and the low risk, high profit investment that assured sick people create.  Until we become truly healthy in our bodies and in our funding of healthy bodies- and a viable competitive alternative comes along to disconnect true healthiness from the sick industry that bears its name- the health industry has no real incentive to change.

Again, Hillary knows this.  What she doesn't know is how to stop Bernie Sanders without establishment support, and so she is resorting to the very things that the GOP will do to Bernie if in fact he is able to actually beat her and be the party nominee.

Is Ted Cruz developing a ceiling on his support that
Trump and Marco Rubio are likely to split if he falters?
Politics 101:  Never give your opponents the knife they're seeking to slay you with.

Of course, if Trump keeps tagging republicans with primary losses and the terrorism of 9-11 (which no other GOP candidate ever admits), the GOP might  soon hand Trump over to Hillary as the knife that she'll use to slash republican throats and make them bleed out all together. Jeb Bush's departure from the race might help the GOP secure a nominee, but the reasonable one's are dropping like flies.

Whatever they try to do to actually stop Trump promises to be an even better show than what we've seen thus far. Either way you project it, the future of this year in politics will be a whole lot of blood shedding, political entertainment as the two party establishment machines fight to kill progressivism while adopting it at the same time.

This week in politics is revealing that the last man or woman standing will be battered and bruised in the eyes of the general electorate because they will have already been weakened and drained of significant life blood from taking too many stiff jabs and knife stabs during the 2016 primary season.

And then the bare knuckle and grenades begin. Today, we took one significant step towards all that.

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Can Clinton/Trump Win This War With The Media?

Trump Letter To CNN's Jeff Zucker

What we are experiencing right now is a form of a litmus test and it is being conducted at the hands of the two leading candidates for president.

On the republican side, there is a test of whether or not a republican candidate can achieve their ultimate mission with Fox News in an adversarial posture against them.

As it stands, Fox is not necessarily an adversary to Donald Trump, but they have yet to fully resolve that Megan Kelly beef or the underlying sense that each reporter on the network is totally torn between their gut journalistic instinct and front office instructions.

The best we can tell thus far, Trump is winning this war and has forced Fox to cater or lose access to a candidate who doesn't currently need any one network to achieve his purpose since each of them seems eager to chase after an interview by phone, in flight or with Trump Towers decorating the backdrop.

Whether or not Trump's posturing will ever need to extrapolate out into the details we seek still lingers in the wind since Donald gave into the GOP by signing that Pledge of allegiance, and Fox gave into Donald by treating him with kid gloves, leaving no one left (but Hugh Hewitt) to corner Donald on details.

Trumps republican opponents will soon have to wage a combine and conquer approach to take out Trump if they can, and then we will see if the GOP party is truly ready to let Trump lead them into permanent change from having to give themselves over to the most liberal republican EVER.

This is a statement campaign worthy of watching for that reason alone, but that is a sideshow to the war between Clinton and the predominant liberal press.

Can Clinton actually win the White House against the will of a LIBERAL mass media still trying to make her say sorry?

Somehow the really smart media thinks Hillary is stupid enough to hope sorry solves the problem.  The moment she says sorry, the question evolves towards new questions of what exactly is there to be sorry for, the actual behaviors or the perception?

Gotcha!!!

The media is a fraternity that only really respects journalistic integrity.

Translation:  the media will search for gotcha moments or obscure military groups like the Quds instead of the familiar Kurdish fighting group to confuse candidates who didn't read the Cliff Notes before the interview, and they will try to make Clinton trip, fall and grovel to their feet just to get a hand up from them, which notoriously never comes.


Why Do You Think They're Called The Press?

Every politicians has been placed in the media wine press to determine their quality and tolerance.  This campaign season, however, a couple of these grapes are not nearly as fragile as usual- kind of with a rubbery, push back quality in fact.

For years in wine and politics, we've only focused on the grape quality looking for stronger varieties that would project powerfully before the world while succumbing to the squeeze of the press as a necessity to the process.

Modern mass media- and wine making- are a whole new world now since do it yourself options have thoroughly invaded each industry.  While home brewed wine has only added to the richness and vastness of an industry that more people understand and deeply engage in, Twitter and Facebook and Yahoo and cable television and everything else that is twice as fast as waiting for that newspaper or network news report,  has changed the media in a unique way that we've yet to give a thumbs up or down to.

Is The Media NOW On The Ballot?

The Summer of Donald has been the season in which a potential presidential candidate tweeted his way to the top.  It might also become the summer that America's most powerful politician finally gets placed on the presidential ballot too- so to speak.

If Trump can actually continue his campaigning without really spending a dime of his billions, he will have done it without a SuperPAC in tow, showing each of US that money is powerful, but not insurmountable if you have media savvy.

That is equally the statement being made in this war against the mass media that Trump and Clinton are actually winning right now.



Eureka!
I have seen the light.  And it is good.  Not only are Trump and
Clinton fighting common enemies, they are doing together.
I just had a revelation that this new observation connects right back to MY same old Clinton/Trump conspiracy theory of the two working together to dismantle a fractured party from the inside out.  If these non media savvy republicans  don't figure out how to out savvy Trump/Clinton, Trump just signed the pledge that beholds the republican party to him versus he to them as the GOP is praying.

So yeah! Add the mass media and even SuperPAC's to my list of groups under coordinated attack by both lead candidates in this election.  I can say with certainty that each of these candidates are individually coordinating against the GOP elite, the mass media and SuperPAC's out of individual necessity.

Are Trump/Clinton also working together?

Was it originally a drunken joke during Donald's wedding reception or an accidental occurrence that is distorted in perception?

 If Clinton was to have a presidential coronation, Trump is providing the red carpet and an etched in history example of how to own the mass media, still the most irresponsibly dangerous politician alive, even worse than Trump.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Until She Quits, Kim Davis Is A Paid Civil Servant

"There ought to be enough space for her to act on her conscience and for gay couples to be able to get married." 

That's what Jeb Bush is now saying after previously standing with the crowd of candidates who understand the importance of the rule of law.  Tapping into that vein of Christian conservative angst that wants republican candidates to understand their pain is  pretty predictable . Laws enacted by Supreme Court intervention can produce protest behaviors, and gay marriage seems to have a strong wave of opposition.

As understandable and expected as Kim Davis and other contrary clerks who will do this are, these are also the people we expected to be throwing into jail because of inevitable protest against this new law. 

 Lawyers who make money at these moments have long since positioned themselves for this opportunity and now its time to go to work. Davis' seemed fully equipped with lawyers (hard to say for how long) who knew very well what the judge would be forced to do regarding this case, although they probably anticipated a hefty bail for their sacrificial lamb to help encourage that "Go Fund Me" page and raise major loot from sympathetic supporters.

Feeling a little raped by conservative GoFundMe causes, GoFundMe has altered their policy to counter against such calculated cash raising. Yet, that will only hamper the effort to get rich off of the gay marriage protest, not stop it.  With no bail set and no GoFundMe page for Davis, staying in jail could be her back door to martyrdom that fulfills this protest mission with Davis as its face.

SCOTUS Laws Come When Congress Collapses

It would be so great if this conversation REALLY had something to do with gay marriage, but capitalism is a predictable opportunist and the Supreme Court only cares to direct America when Congress Does Not. Enough on that.

Conservative Governors have long since wondered how much they could test the power of Federal control over state laws.  With the end of pot prohibition in a couple of states, and undocumented workers having sanctuary states, even liberal leaders are testing a Federal willingness to enforce certain laws exactly as they are written on the books.

Whether these pokes at the Constitutions perimeter have created the leaks in law enforcement that makes Kim Davis wonder if she is duty bound to sign marriage licenses for gays is truly a worthy debate too, but not this time.

This time, we have to point the questions and the fingers at each of the presidential candidates that don't have the integrity or the sense to defend the rule of law at least until after they become president like Obama did.

How any member of congress could find the audacity and verve to complain about a Supreme Court decision given their power to define or redefine law is interesting. How any potential president who is expected to uphold the rule of law would equivocate on such an issue is eye blinking.

Go take your judicial branch Quiz (send a copy to Kim Davis)
4. True or false? State courts must follow the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Your answer: 

The correct answer is "True".
State courts as well as federal courts must follow the Supreme Court of the United States.
5. A Supreme Court decision that a law is unconstitutional can be invalidated by
    (Choose two)
    a. a majority of district and appeals court judges’ rejection of the decision, with a showing of why it was erroneous
    b. a later decision by the Supreme Court
    c. a new law enacted by Congress upholding the first law
    d. an amendment to the Constitution
    e. a motion by a majority of the justices to rescind the decision
    f. Kim Davis.
Your answer: 
The correct answer is "b and d".
All federal and state courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions, and Congress may not strike down its decisions. The Supreme Court can overrule its own decision only in a ruling on a new case. Constitutional amendments are rare.

In the absence of any reasonable alternative to support Kim Davis and her decision to disobey the law, many candidates have chosen the kind of politics that you only do when you know you can't win and you never intend to run for president again.

Either Davis must follow the law as Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham and Hillary Clinton and every lucid candidate has declared, or sit in jail until the statement she's making has been made to her satisfaction (ie., rot in hell if you so choose).

Those who are supporting the actions of Mrs. Davis are either way too low in the polls  or way too angry about OPS (other people's sins) for the repercussions to matter much in their calculations.

But they are wrong and waving the white flag on the presidency at the same time.  This matters because this is the same rule of law as women's suffrage was or interracial marriage became which both were once illegal because God didn't used to like women or folks with jungle fever.  Now, God has reduced his list to disliking only gays who want to marry and maybe people who get abortions- rape exception excluded (I think).

I absolutely agree that God's law supersedes man's laws forcing each of us of faith to draw this line at times. I'm still not sure how I even finished high school science with my big bang skepticism.

Whenever principle forces you to challenge Supreme Court decisions, prepare yourself and your principle to sit in jail (or the principals office) for as long as principle remains your key motivation. Long long ago, America chose it necessary to separate Church from State , and the State won that war of hierarchy.

Kim Davis and Kim Davis alone was elected to fulfill a PAID civic duty. Once Kim Davis is tired of the statement she's making in jail, she must either return to sign every marriage license expected of her according to Kentucky law, until her term is over, or go right back to jail. In her new career after civil service, Davis could become an organized protester since she's getting some background in the work and her jail time should provide a little protester street cred.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

"On The Phone": Donald Trump Hijacking Air Time (and GOP) While Still In Pajamas


Hillary could learn from Donald when it comes to calling out opponents by name.
Generalizations generally assume that voters are watching that closely right now.  They are not!
Now that Fox News., Megan Kelly and Donald Trump have buried the hatchet, Trump has moved towards attacking Jeb on his position with women instead of remaining on the defense regarding his own standing among women spurned by the Kelly conflict.

Trump has overtaken Scott Walker in Iowa after the debate.
Prior to the debate Walker dominated Iowa polling.


The newest ploy of Trump is to call in to news stations who are notoriously hungry for such exclusives, especially the kind that don't require much staging on set.  Trump's comfort with using the media to his bidding is becoming more than a factor in the republican race.  It might allow Trump to hijack the GOP, a party that's longed for a true face for some time now like Barack and Hillary have been for the Dem's.




When Did Immigration & Abortion 
Become Winning GOP Issues?

Trump might not be willing to devote himself to the party, but the party (as reflected by Fox giving in to Donald) has accepted that he is a necessary evil and might have been the sole reason for 24 million viewers during their debate.

Trump is certainly partly right when he say's that 24 million viewers tuned in because of him, though he didn't mention that most were hoping to view the train wreck that they mosty got.  He is also correct when he says that we wouldn't be talking about immigration or abortion if it were not for him.

That's not a good thing Donald.  That's not a good thing.

What was a good thing was pointed out in an article by Vox.com.  Donald Trump was the only person on the stage to offer a real and really valuable policy point when he suggested the cross state line commerce idea that many of us have long awaited for the ACA, the only idea guaranteed to force pricing changes that insurance companies are still resistant to.   This is not a new idea or one unique to Trump, but it was the best policy point of the night which only accentuates the weakness of the republican debate as it related to real substance.

PREVIOUS POSTS:

         Thursday, July 23, 2015